Judge: Black Activist Can’t Represent Neo-Nazi Group In Charlottesville Suit

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The black civil rights activist who claims to have taken over a decades-old U.S. neo-Nazi group was barred from representing the group in a lawsuit, the Associated Press reported Thursday.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel Hoppe had previously ordered the activist, James Hart Stern, to retain a lawyer on the National Socialist Movement’s behalf since he was not one himself. The NSM and its former leader were named in a federal lawsuit brought on behalf of 11 people injured during the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

But Stern never retained counsel. He maintains he assumed control of the NSM from longtime leader Jeff Schoep in order to destroy the group.

As a result, Hoppe ruled Thursday that a Virginia-based lawyer would be allowed to represent both the NSM and Schoep in the lawsuit, according to the AP.

This is the latest development in a strange saga that began in February when Schoep signed over corporate control of the group to Stern. Schoep said he did so because he thought relinquishing control to a black man would help persuade the plaintiffs to drop NSM as a defendant.

But Schoep’s plans didn’t quite pan out.

Stern embarked on a press blitz, boasting that he’d successfully duped Schoep into abandoning the neo-Nazi group he’d led for decades.

So Schoep promptly reversed course, submitting new incorporation filings replacing Stern as the NSM’s president. He has insisted that Stern has no leadership claim or legitimate connection to the group.

Stern then filed a lawsuit in California seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages from Schoep and other NSM leaders.

As TPM reported, the NSM has been hemorrhaging members for years and was financially damaged by the Charlottesville suit. The bizarre Stern fiasco essentially represented a death knell for the neo-Nazi group.

Latest Muckraker
31
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. If it’s a corporation, it can only appear in court through a lawyer. Corporations, being legal fictions, can’t represent themselves.

  2. Why not? The Supremes found that Corporations are people to, with their own Freedom of Speech. Not such a stretch to say that they could represent themselves however they see fit!

    Now, back in the day when we were governed by the Rule of Law…

  3. What I wonder is, how hard would it be to get a lawyer?

    Seems like the only reason handed this to a lawyer representing Schoep and the Nazis was because Stern didn’t get a lawyer.

    Am I missing something?

    Cc @castor_troy

  4. Getting one is easy, except for the payment part. I don’t think Stern wants to commit anything more than time to this stunt.

  5. True, but allowing one attorney to represent both sides in the dispute seems a tad, well, weird.

    Peorgie Tirebiter: “But, Gee, Dad - I still don’t understand how you can be the Peoples Prosecutor and my defense lawyer at the same time…"
    Fred/Adolph/George Tirebiter: “Easy, son. That way I can see that you are persecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
    Peorgie: “That’s my Dad!”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

25 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for cervantes Avatar for ottnott Avatar for kitty Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for bboerner Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for unit44 Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for maximus Avatar for 10c Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for poeducker

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: