Jan. 6 Committee Asks Reps. Brooks, Biggs, Jackson For Info

Three MAGA congressmen received the non-binding requests.
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) objects to the certification of votes from Nevada in the House Chamber during a reconvening of a joint session of Congress on January 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. Mem... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) objects to the certification of votes from Nevada in the House Chamber during a reconvening of a joint session of Congress on January 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. Members of Congress returned to the House Chamber after being evacuated when protesters stormed the Capitol and disrupted a joint session to ratify President-elect Joe Biden's 306-232 Electoral College win over President Donald Trump. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Jan. 6 Committee issued requests to three congressmen on Monday, focusing on what it described as a plot to “occupy the Capitol.”

Reps. Mo Brooks (R-AL), Andy Biggs (R-AZ), and Ronny Jackson (R-TX) all received the requests, which ask the members to cooperate with the panel on a voluntary basis.

In the letters to Biggs and Jackson, the panel repeatedly referred to efforts that it purportedly uncovered by the Oath Keepers and far-right provocateur Ali Alexander to “occupy the Capitol” on Jan. 6.

Filings in a federal criminal sedition case against the Oath Keepers revealed last month that some members of the group said on Jan. 6 that they were seeking to protect Jackson. The Committee includes those texts in its request to him, saying that it is “examining the coordination by various individuals and organizations on January 6th to ‘Occupy the Capitol,’ in an effort to obstruct Congress’s official proceeding to count electoral votes.”

The panel added in the request that Jackson had been present at the rally on the ellipse on the morning of Jan. 6.

“We would like to discuss how and when you returned from the Ellipse to the Capitol, and the contacts you had with participants in the rally or the subsequent march from the Ellipse to the Capitol,” the request reads.

Similarly, the request to Biggs centers an alleged plot to “Occupy the Capitol,” referencing a statement from Ali Alexander that Biggs helped develop the idea to stage protests on Jan. 6 along with two other members of Congress.

Alexander had said in a video unearthed after Jan. 6 that Biggs, alongs with Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) and Brooks, “schemed up putting maximum pressure on Congress while they were voting.”

Citing its own information, the panel says that Alexander was linked “to efforts to ‘Occupy the Capitol.'”

“We would like to understand precisely what you knew before the violence on January 6th about the purposes, planning, and expectations for the march on the Capitol,” the request to Biggs reads.

The request to Brooks does not directly mention any effort to “Occupy the Capitol.” Rather, it focuses on a statement that Brooks issued in March where he claimed to have advised Trump that it would be impossible and unconstitutional to “rescind” the 2020 election result.

“As you know, the Committee is examining a series of efforts by President Trump to abandon his solemn duty to support and defend our Constitution,” the request reads. “The exchange you have disclosed with the former President is directly relevant to the subject of our inquiry, and it appears to provide additional evidence of President Trump’s intent to restore himself to power through unlawful means.”

Brooks told reporters that Trump had asked him for help in “rescinding” the result after September 2021, and had done so “multiple times.” That announcement came after Trump moved to un-endorse Brooks for re-election.

Latest Muckraker
228
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Working their way up the ladder…

  2. I feel like being given the chance to stonewall the committee is becoming a badge of honour for the hard-right - that’s why Alex Jones was begging for a chance to turn up and plead the Fifth at them.

  3. Don’t ask, subpoena

  4. Spoiler: They’re not going to cooperate.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

222 more replies

Participants

Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for danny Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for edhedh Avatar for rickjones Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for glowgirl Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for dicktater Avatar for carpe_diem Avatar for Ethics_Gradient

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: