In Major Move, Census Bureau Offers Up Citizenship Data For Redistricting

NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 3: Signs sit behind the podium before the start of a press conference with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to announce a multi-state lawsuit to block the Trump administration from add... NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 3: Signs sit behind the podium before the start of a press conference with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to announce a multi-state lawsuit to block the Trump administration from adding a question about citizenship to the 2020 Census form, at the headquarters of District Council 37, New York City's largest public employee union, April 3, 2018 in New York City. Critics of President Donald Trump's administration's decision to reinstate the citizenship question contend that that it will frighten people in immigrant communities from responding to the census. The Trump administration has stated a citizenship question on the census will help enforce voting rights. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In what could be a major change for voting rights and the distribution of political power between urban and rural areas, the Census Bureau signaled Friday that it is willing to work with state and local officials charged with drawing voting districts if they want citizenship data for the redistricting process.

The move to inject citizenship into redistricting has been feared since the Trump administration decided to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The addition of the citizenship to the census remains embroiled in litigation.

The indication came in the form of a federal registry notice with the Office of Budget and Management outlining the next steps the Census Bureau intends to take as it prepares for the decennial survey.

“The Census Bureau intends to work with stakeholders, specifically ‘the officers or public bodies having initial responsibility for the legislative apportionment of each state,’’ to solicit feedback on the content of the prototype redistricting data file,” the notice said. “If those stakeholders indicate a need for tabulations of citizenship data on the 2020 Census Public Law 94–171 Redistricting Data File, the Census Bureau will make a design change to include citizenship as part of that data.”

The design change would be published in the federal registry in the summer of 2019, the notice said.

The Trump administration, in deciding to include a citizenship question in the 2020 survey, claimed the question was requested by the Justice Department for Voting Rights Act enforcement. That claim that has been contradicted by internal records since released in lawsuits challenging the move.

The decision prompted alarm by voting rights activists, civil rights advocates and policy wonks. They believe it will depress the participation of immigrant communities on the census — causing an undercount that would shift political power and resources away from those populations — while also leading to exclusion of non-citizens in legislative redistricting altogether in some states and localities.

It is not clear whether the Bureau is offering up the citizenship data in anticipation that officials would seek to exclude noncitizens from redistricting, or if the Bureau had in mind assisting officials in drawing Voting Rights Act-compliant maps, which take into account citizen voting populations. In the past, a smaller scale Census survey has provided the citizenship estimates that are used for Voting Rights Acts purposes.

However, Nate Persily, an election law expert at Stanford Law School, noted that the data set being referenced in the notice was the minimum thought to be necessary for redistricting that the Bureau makes available for state and local officials.

“By providing citizenship data with the initial salvo of data that states will have for redistricting, they are not only enabling the drawing of VRA-compliant districts but they are also enabling the drawing of districts based on the whole number of citizens rather than the whole number of people,” he said.

TPM tried to call the Census Bureau communications office to inquire about the notice, but met an automated message noting the partial government shutdown. The Bureau did not immediately respond to TPM’s email inquiry about the notice.

Drawing districts based on the number of citizens instead of the number of residents has been a long sought goal of conservatives. While the Supreme Court in a recent case reaffirmed the use of total population for redistricting, whether states or localities could use another metric is a more open legal question.

Doing so would be a major electoral advantage for Republicans, as it would boost the number of representatives that less diverse, more rural communities received while diminishing the representation of urban, more immigrant-friendly areas.

If state or local officials seek the citizenship data after the 2020 census for the purposes of excluding noncitizens from redistricting, it will likely lead to a hugely consequential legal battle.

Read the full federal registry notice below:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. GOP steals elections. Breaking news?

  2. Avatar for sanni sanni says:

    Great reporting, Tierney. There is not enough coverage of this issue on the most general level, let alone on the nitty gritty of what is trying to be done and why. Thanks - and keep it up!

  3. I thought that citizenship question was still in litigation

  4. Chief Justice John Roberts: “Our country has changed…voting tests were abolished, disparities in voter registration and turnout due to race were erased, and African-Americans attained political office in record numbers. And yet the coverage formula that Congress reauthorized in 2006 ignores these developments, keeping the focus on decades-old data relevant to decades-old problems, rather than current data reflecting current needs.”

    “Post-racial America” now is free from all that ancient history of racial discrimination.

    (Or something.)

  5. Avatar for spin spin says:

    This has been a long term goal of Conservatives. IMHO - and many - it is unconstitutional for federal offices given the structure of the constitution, which talks about “persons” and also of the very clear view that non-citizens counted for representation purposes, which is why the founders had to compromise on slaves counting as 3/5s of a person.

    That said, I have little faith that 3 members of the supreme court (Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch) are deciding issues based upon a genuine view of the law, but instead on politics, and the jury is still out on Kav.

    The issue will certainly come up, with the question being how Roberts votes. Does he do what the Right wants, or does he pretect his and the Court’s legitimacy.

    This said, that it can’t be done at the Federal Level, does not mean that it can’t be done at the State Level. E.g. Texas could try to do it at the state level, ditto Arizona or Georgia. But it would require the republicans to be in control of all three branches of government.

Continue the discussion at

117 more replies


Avatar for paulw Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for msinformed Avatar for sniffit Avatar for lastroth Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for gr Avatar for sanni Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tena Avatar for d2square Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for tsp Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for pareedave Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for lisaaug Avatar for winston12 Avatar for spin Avatar for holywah Avatar for thisisourcountry Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: