READ: House Judiciary Releases Transcript Of Hope Hicks’ Testimony

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 19: Former White House communications director Hope Hicks leaves after a closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee June 19, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Hicks is the fi... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 19: Former White House communications director Hope Hicks leaves after a closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee June 19, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Hicks is the first former Trump aide to testify before the panel’s investigation into special counsel Robert Mueller’s report and obstruction of justice. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS

The House Judiciary Committee released the transcript of former White House communications director Hope Hicks’s testimony on Thursday.

The 273-page transcript includes 155 separate instances in which a White House attorney present at the closed Wednesday hearing intervened to prevent Hicks from replying to lawmakers’ questions.

Almost immediately after the start of questioning, the White House attorney, who House Democrats permitted to attend the hearing, began to issue “objections” to questions asked by committee chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY).

For example, Nadler asked Hicks whether Corey Lewandowski was hired as an official in the White House.

White House attorney Michael Purpura immediately objected.

“It’s a matter of public record. Why would you object?” Nadler asked.

Purpura replied: “Ms. Hicks may not be compelled to speak about events that occurred during her service as a senior adviser to the President.”

Nadler dismissed Purpura’s reasoning as “absolute nonsense as a matter of law,” but the objections appear to have prevented Hicks from replying to many of House Democrats’ questions.

Hicks also told lawmakers that she has spoken with Trump “somewhere between five and 10” times since she left the White House. She specified that the last time they spoke was at an April dinner. She did not reply to a question about whether they discussed ongoing congressional investigations after attorneys objected.

Read the full transcript here:

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Muckraker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: