READ: House Judiciary Releases Transcript Of Hope Hicks’ Testimony

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 19: Former White House communications director Hope Hicks leaves after a closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee June 19, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Hicks is the fi... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 19: Former White House communications director Hope Hicks leaves after a closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee June 19, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Hicks is the first former Trump aide to testify before the panel’s investigation into special counsel Robert Mueller’s report and obstruction of justice. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House Judiciary Committee released the transcript of former White House communications director Hope Hicks’s testimony on Thursday.

The 273-page transcript includes 155 separate instances in which a White House attorney present at the closed Wednesday hearing intervened to prevent Hicks from replying to lawmakers’ questions.

Almost immediately after the start of questioning, the White House attorney, who House Democrats permitted to attend the hearing, began to issue “objections” to questions asked by committee chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY).

For example, Nadler asked Hicks whether Corey Lewandowski was hired as an official in the White House.

White House attorney Michael Purpura immediately objected.

“It’s a matter of public record. Why would you object?” Nadler asked.

Purpura replied: “Ms. Hicks may not be compelled to speak about events that occurred during her service as a senior adviser to the President.”

Nadler dismissed Purpura’s reasoning as “absolute nonsense as a matter of law,” but the objections appear to have prevented Hicks from replying to many of House Democrats’ questions.

Hicks also told lawmakers that she has spoken with Trump “somewhere between five and 10” times since she left the White House. She specified that the last time they spoke was at an April dinner. She did not reply to a question about whether they discussed ongoing congressional investigations after attorneys objected.

Read the full transcript here:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. But there was nothing to redact? She didn’t answer anything.

  2. Avatar for outis outis says:

    Barr would redact her failure to answer.

  3. The administration is down with waterboarding, isn’t it? The committee could allow her to bring her posse of lawyers.

  4. Rep Nadler: “Ms. Hicks, did you use deionized, distilled, or just plain tap water when steaming the President’s trousers?”
    Purpura: “Ms. Hicks may not be compelled to speak about events that occurred during her service as a senior adviser to the President.”

  5. Nadler: “Refusal to answer is an outrageous misreading of the law and an affront to the entire institution of the United States Congress! But anyway let’s move on to the next question”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

154 more replies

Participants

Avatar for cabchi Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for punaise Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for marby Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for irasdad Avatar for rick Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for skippyflipjack Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for georgeh Avatar for maximus Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for zillacop Avatar for haddockbranzini Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: