Top House GOPers Ask DOJ To Appoint Special Counsel To Probe Bias At Dept.

on April 25, 2013 in Washington, DC.
<> on April 25, 2013 in Washington, DC.

Two Republican House committee chairmen on Tuesday asked the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to investigate any bias at the Justice Department and FBI in the latest attempt by conservatives to paint the Russia investigation as a witch hunt out to hurt President Donald Trump.

House Oversight Committee Chair Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and House Judiciary Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) told Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter that they are concerned about “decisions made and not made” at the DOJ and FBI in 2016 and 2017. They wrote that in the majority of cases, U.S. law enforcement officials have acted appropriately but claimed that there are “instances in which an actual or potential conflict of interest exists or appears to exist.”

Though they do not single out the Russia investigation or the so-called Trump dossier authored by former British spy Christopher Steele, it’s apparent that Gowdy and Goodlatte are concerned about exactly that.

“There is evidence of bias, trending toward animus, among those charged with investigating serious cases. There is evidence political opposition research was used in court filings. There is evidence this political opposition research was neither vetted before it was used nor fully revealed to the relevant tribunal,” Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote, adding that they also have concerns about the surveillance application process.

Conservatives in the House have drummed up concern over the process the Justice Department used to conduct surveillance of Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aide. The effort culminated recently in the release of a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee claiming that the Justice Department improperly used the Steele dossier to justify its surveillance of Page.

Democrats have dismissed these claims, charging in a rebuttal memo that the DOJ only used a small part of the dossier in its application to surveil Page and that the DOJ submitted information from independent sources corroborating parts of the Steele Dossier in renewal applications. Republicans have also claimed that the DOJ did not reveal to the court that the dossier was crafted as opposition research, but the Democratic memo counters that the DOJ told the court that the dossier had a political motive.

Conservatives in Congress have been calling for a special prosecutor for a while, but the letter from Gowdy and Goodlatte elevates the request

The letter also comes only about a week after President Donald Trump criticized Sessions on Twitter for directing the DOJ inspector general to investigate bias in the surveillance application process.

In their letter, Gowdy and Goodlatte argue that the inspector general is not the best individual to investigate the matter because he “does not have the authority to investigate other governmental entities or former employees of the Department, the Bureau, or other agencies.”

44
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Aaannddd…Gowdy Doody is back.

  2. IMO this really does prove that the entire GOP is likely to be on Putin’s payroll, and they need to sweep that fact under the rug.

  3. Oh, for fuck’s goddamn sake. How is it possible for these two steaming piles to not spontaneously combust from the sheer internal pressure of mendacity and hypocrisy?

    But, given that they both just stuck their heads into a coil of the anchor rope as it goes racing to the bottom of the deep, deep sea, one wonders why. Yes, one wonders.

  4. Oh happy crap…nothing like wasting MORE money while acting like sanctimonious boobs for ‘truth’. Just go the fk away.

  5. Republicans continue to crap in the bath water and call it bubble bath.

    This kind of lying and posturing continues to lay the groundwork for a very dangerous and potentially bloody end to Trumpocracy - they continue to encourage the thinking that instead of Trump being the most corrupt President in history it is simply government bias and secret conspiracies in our own government working against him. What could be more dangerous than this kind of thinking?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

38 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for sysprog Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for bob Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for musgrove Avatar for bosfarcal Avatar for claimsadjuster Avatar for brewhousebob Avatar for maricaibo Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for socalista Avatar for thinski Avatar for maximus Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for anne53

Continue Discussion