DOJ ‘Suggests’ SCOTUS ‘Reconsider’ Delaying Census Case Proceedings

Police office guards the main entrance to the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018. A Supreme Court with a new conservative majority takes the bench as Brett Kavanaugh, narrowly confirmed after a bitter... Police office guards the main entrance to the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018. A Supreme Court with a new conservative majority takes the bench as Brett Kavanaugh, narrowly confirmed after a bitter Senate battle, joins his new colleagues to hear his first arguments as a justice. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The night before the Justice Department is scheduled to make its closing arguments in the Census citizenship trial in New York, U.S. Solicitor General Noel Fransisco filed an unusual letter with the Supreme Court Monday “suggest[ing]” that the Supreme Court “reconsider” delaying the case’s post-trial proceedings, now that the high court has decided to hear arguments on a discovery dispute in the case.

“In light of this Court’s grant of the government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, the government respectfully suggests that the Court may wish to reconsider staying further trial proceedings,” the letter said.

The Supreme Court had previously rejected the Justice Department’s request that the court delay the trial before it started earlier this month. The court has since announced that it was going to hear arguments in February over whether a judge could order certain depositions and additional discovery in the case. One of those depositions, of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who decided to add the citizenship question to the 2020 survey, had already been halted by the Supreme Court. But the high court let the deposition of  a DOJ official involved in adding the question, as well as the additional discovery, go forward.

Monday evening’s letter is part of a pattern under the Trump administration of the Justice Department aggressively seeking Supreme Court intervention, even when cases are at a relatively early stage in the judicial process. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman last week issued a fiery order when the Justice Department again tried to get the proceedings in this case delayed, and an appeals court also rejected the request.

Read the letter below:

Latest Muckraker
30
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. WTF, please proceed, SCOTUS!

  2. Avatar for ghost ghost says:

    Rules and process clearly don’t matter to the Trump administration or the Solicitor General. We’ll see if they still matter to the Supreme Court.

  3. Avatar for pine pine says:

    "Supreme Court intervention, even when cases are at a relatively early stage in the judicial process. "
    From my understanding the Supremes like to come in at a much later time in cases they hear.Hail Mary right about now DOJ is throwing.

  4. “Monday evening’s letter is part of a pattern under the Trump administration of the Justice Department aggressively seeking Supreme Court intervention, even when cases are at a relatively early stage in the judicial process.”

    Duh…they think they have the SCOTUS in their pocket and most of us agree they do, so why WOULDN’T that be their strategery?

  5. Trump got to appoint 2 justices, so he now thinks it’s “his” Supreme Court.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

24 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for gr Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for pine Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for magicmaker Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for docd Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for numbertwopencil Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for rocklaverve Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for rickjones Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for nycabj Avatar for drtv

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: