DC Circuit Holds That Congress Can Sue For McGahn Testimony

White House Counsel Don McGahn watches Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27, 2018. (Photo by Saul Loeb-Pool/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed Friday that Congress could turn to the courts to get its subpoena of President Trump’s former White House Counsel Don McGahn enforced.

The circuit court roundly rejected McGahn’s arguments — previously adopted by a panel of three judges from the appeals court — that the judiciary should not get involved in these kinds of disputes between the legislative and executive  branches.

Friday’s decision — while an important victory for the House of Representatives — does not end the litigation over its McGahn subpoena. The full D.C. Circuit did not address the other claims McGahn brought to challenge the subpoena, and said it would leave it to the appellate panel to take another bite at those issues, now that the question of the courts’ authority in this arena had been resolved.

The case reflects what so far has been a successful strategy by President Trump and his administration to lob extreme arguments for why congressional subpoenas are not legitimate. Even when those arguments get rejected in court, as they largely have, the slow pace of the judicial process has allowed Trump to run down the clock before the 2020 election.

The D.C. Circuit said in this dispute that McGahn’s arguments were “unpersuasive,” while calling the administration’s widespread resistance to such subpoenas “apparently unprecedented.”

“By refusing to testify in response to the Committee’s concededly valid subpoena, McGahn has denied the Committee something to which it alleges it is entitled by law. And because the Committee has alleged the deprivation of testimony to which it is legally entitled, its asserted injury is concrete,” the court said.

It noted the fact that so few disputes like this had played out in courts, saying it was reflective of a tradition of accommodation in which both sides — feeling pressure to keep their fights out of court — are incentivized to coming to an agreement.

“Indeed, the threat of a subpoena enforcement lawsuit may be an essential tool in keeping the Executive Branch at the negotiating table,” the court said.
“Without that possibility, Presidents could direct widescale non-compliance with lawful inquiries by a House of Congress, secure in the knowledge that little can be done to enforce its subpoena — as President Trump did here,” the court added.

The D.C. Circuit referenced the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Mazars case, where Trump, in his personal capacity, was trying to block a House subpoena issued to his financial firms for certain Trump records.

The appeals court noted that case dealt with different legal issues but, it said, the Supreme Court’s opinion had backed an idea of “constitutional power” that “entitles each House to the testimony of a witness and production of requested documents in response to a lawful subpoena.”

Read the ruling here:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Countdown to Trump clueless retaliatory move on something anywhere not remotely related.

  2. Great news. This means McGahn will have to testify sometime around 2023.

  3. Trump needs five votes at the Supremes to ride this out past the election. Will Roberts give it to him? I wouldn’t be surprised either way.

    ETA: Having just read the conclusion of the majority, this case is a long way from over. The en banc court is actually remanding to the original panel for consideration of all of McGahn’s objections other than standing. In other words, Henderson and Griffith will once again have the opportunity to make a bad faith ruling protecting Trump from scrutiny, which the full court may or may not ever get to correct because the subpoena is moot on January 3.

  4. Trump files for a stay pending cert application. Granted 5-4. After election becomes irrelevant.

  5. “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice”…

    Please speed it up because our democracy is being attacked!

    It’s not the only lawsuit that can proceed…

    the lawsuit filed by journalist E. Jean Carroll could move forward and need not wait for an appeals court decision

    “We are now eager to move forward with discovery so that we can prove that Donald Trump defamed E. Jean Carroll when he lied about her in connection with her brave decision to tell the truth about the fact that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her,” said Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer for Carroll.

    Looking forward to the discovery!

    Addendum:

    Let us NOT forget that McGahn ushered Kavanaugh to the SC…
    urging him to push back hard on sexual-assault accusations!

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-man-behind-the-brett-kavanaugh-strategy-don-mcgahn-1538594487

    Addendum2:

    Trump, his family and his enablers/cronies need to face the consequences of their corruption, criminality and cruelty…
    Vote Trump OUT!

    Addendum3:

    AND there’s another lawsuit (its wrt to the deal made by Acosta - former Trump’s SecLabor - with Epstein) that gets a second chance…

    The young victims of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will get a second chance at seeking justice after an entire appellate court agreed Friday to rehear claims that federal prosecutors in South Florida violated their rights when they kept them in the dark about a secret plea deal with the now-deceased Palm Beach multimillionaire.

    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article244800452.html

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

80 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for zandru Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for joelopines Avatar for airportman Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for mount_baldy Avatar for tiowally Avatar for rwickwar Avatar for rptwiz Avatar for john819 Avatar for katscherger Avatar for maximus Avatar for nohat42 Avatar for jm917 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for juvenal Avatar for kovie Avatar for Hatmama

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: