Court Blocks Kobach’s Scheme For Proof-Of-Citizenship In Kansas Elections

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach makes his victory speech at a Republican watch party Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2014, in Topeka, Kan. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was on the receiving end of yet another adverse ruling in the litigation surrounding the state’s proof-of-citizenship voter registration requirement, which Kobach championed.

A state court in Topeka Friday placed a permanent injunction on a work-around Kobach tried to implement after federal courts deemed the requirement a violation of the National Voter Registration Act. Blocked was his system in which Kansas voters who registered to vote using the federal methods that did not require a documentary proof-of-citizenship would only be able to vote in federal elections, and not in state and local races.

State Judge Larry D. Hendricks on Friday said that the “two-tiered system” that Kobach created with a temporary regulation was a violation of his authority under state law, and that a permanent injunction was required to protect voters.

“Just as a homeowner is ill-advised to patch a fractured foundation with duct tape, however, so too has the Defendant’s temporary regulation led to additional challenges for all parties involved,” Hendricks said.

Kansas’ proof-of-citizenship requirement has faced a number of lawsuits that have come at it at various angles. The requirement was only added to the federal voter registration form used in the state after a Kobach ally became the executive director for the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, which is in charge of some of the federal administrative issues surrounding elections. That action was blocked in September by a federal appeals court, which ordered the old version of the federal form be restored in Kansas and the other two states Newby had approved the change for.

A state court had previously placed a temporary injunction on Kobach’s efforts to implement a dual system.

According to Hendricks’ decision Friday, more than 18,000 voters stood to be potentially affected by the two-tiered system, while Kansas, in its brief had put forward evidence of only 25 cases since 2003 of non-citizens being registered to vote.

“The number non-citizen registrations are miniscule compared to the number of voters that potentially will be unable to vote,” Hendricks said.

The court said Kobach did not have the authority to create the two-tiered system.

“The question, then, is whether the Defendant actually has the power to create a two-class system of voter registration, in order to comply with the federal courts’ interpretation of the NVRA, under one of the four statutes he identifies,” Hendricks said. “In this Court’s opinion, he does not”

The lawsuit had been brought by the ACLU and a handful of Kansas voters.

“This ruling is a victory for Kansas voters and a stinging rebuke of Secretary Kobach’s repeated efforts to improperly use his authority to obstruct their access to the ballot,” Sophia Lakin, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, said in a statement. “This decision recognizes that Kansans’ right to vote in state and local elections should be honored, no matter what registration form they used.”

Read the decision below:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Kris Kobach should be held personally liable for court costs for all the cases lost around the country due to his voter suppression/disenfranchisement bullshit. It’s the only way he’ll ever “get the message.”

  2. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    This is great. I’d like to see Kobach disgraced and unemployed, but mitigating his damage is a start.

    I also like the clear statement from the court (even though it’s dictum) that the damage to democracy from disenfranchising more than 10,000 voters clearly outweighs the (potential) damage from a couple dozen non-citizen registrations.

  3. Avatar for edys edys says:

    Just reading about the legal gyrations of this raging bigot is exhausting. How difficult will it be to vote despite them? Is it too late to undo the damage?

  4. I’m willing to deal here. I’ll give you proof of citizenship for voter registration if you give me proof of citizenship for purchase and ownership of guns. Don’t want any of them stealin’, rapin’, drug-dealin’ Mexicans, or any of them Sharia-spreaden Isis and Al-Qaeda types just walking into any Walmart and buying a gun, do you? Do you? Make 'em show their long form birth certificates.

  5. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    They wouldn’t take that, but no. Not unless/until states are required to provide proof of citizenship for free, including free provision of any prerequisite documents. (I think about this in the context of my grandfather, who wouldn’t have been able to “prove” his citizenship, except for the fact that he was a White Man of Good Family so there was never any question that his birth ceritficate had been destroyed in an earthquake.)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for charliee Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for oldvet Avatar for eztempo Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for rev Avatar for egyptsteve Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for quax Avatar for twowolves Avatar for jcblues Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for tiowally Avatar for jsrtheta Avatar for maximus Avatar for edys

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: