Census Official: Sessions Used ‘Political Influence’ In Handling Of Citizenship Request

on February 2, 2017 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 02: U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions, a committee member, waits for the beginning of a meeting of Senate Environment and Public Works Committee February 2, 2017 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Co... WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 02: U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions, a committee member, waits for the beginning of a meeting of Senate Environment and Public Works Committee February 2, 2017 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Committee chairman Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) suspended the rules and passed the confirm of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to become the next administrator of Environmental Protection Agency with only Republican votes, after Democratic members have boycotted the meeting for a second day. The confirmation will need to be voted on later by the full Senate. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS

The top scientist at the Census Bureau testified Wednesday that then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions exerted “political influence” when he directed Justice Department staff not to meet with census experts about the Justice Department’s request to add a citizenship question to the census.

Census official John Abowd was being grilled about Sessions’ personal intervention — which was confirmed in a deposition by a top DOJ official — in the process that agencies usually go through in asking the Census Bureau to add questions to the decennial census.

ACLU attorney Dale Ho asked specifically if such a move was a consistent with a guidebook outlining principles and practices for federal statistical agencies, which says that a “federal statistical agency must be independent from political and other undue external influence in developing, producing, and disseminating statistics.”

“Many experts, including myself, would interpret that as political influence,” Abowd said.

Abowd’s testimony was in the ongoing federal trial in New York over Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’s move to add a citizenship question to the census. The case is a consolidation of lawsuits brought by the ACLU and by a multi-state coalition. The lawsuits allege the move was unconstitutional, as well as a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, which allows courts to strike down agency decisions found to be “arbitrary” or “capricious.”

Ross called Sessions personally in the fall of 2017 seeking that the Justice Department formally request a citizenship question, which it did in a December 2017 letter claiming that the data would aid Voting Rights Act enforcement.

Abowd and his team of experts analyzed the request and found that the Justice Department’s data needs would be better met if the Census Bureau pulled the citizenship data from existing administrative records. The Census Bureau concluded that adding the question would be costly and would result in less accurate data.

Abowd’s team sought to meet with Justice Department staff to discuss this assessment in early 2018. Sessions directed the Justice Department to cancel the meeting, John Gore, who then led the civil rights division, testified in deposition.

Abowd testified that he wasn’t aware at the time that Sessions had given that directive and said he wasn’t aware of another circumstance in which an attorney general directed his staff not to discuss with the Census Bureau a request for data.

Sessions was ousted from the Justice Department last week, after months that President Trump griped about his recusal from the Russia investigation. The Justice Department declined to comment on Abowd’s testimony.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Muckraker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: