There’s more to the charges against Trump confidant Tom Barrack, a newly unsealed document reveals.
But the complaint and an attached affidavit by an FBI agent reveals more detail about the federal government’s investigation into the alleged influence operation, which saw Barrack arrested last week in Los Angeles.
Barrack pleaded not guilty to all the charges against him in Brooklyn federal court on Monday.
The complaint, however, places Al-Malik as the main conduit for not only an Emirati influence campaign, but a Saudi one as well. Prosecutors allege that much of this occurred via an unnamed U.S. Person 1, who appears to match Barrack’s description as “a friend” to then-candidate Donald Trump and an “adviser and surrogate for the Campaign” who “continued to advise senior U.S. government officials with respect to Middle East policy” after the 2016 election.
In the affidavit, an FBI agent alleges that Al-Malik worked with the person who matches Barrack’s description and a senior Trump campaign official in May 2016 to push UAE and Saudi influence.
At that time, the group was allegedly trying to arrange a meeting between unnamed UAE officials and Trump after the person who appears to be Barrack travelled to Abu Dhabi with Al-Malik.
“I am in Abu Dhabi with [UAE Official 1]. Call if u can,” wrote the person who matches Barrack’s description to an unnamed senior Trump campaign official on May 1.
That allegedly progressed throughout the month. On May 4, the person who matches Barrack’s description purportedly wrote to Al-Malik saying, “Tell [the senior UAE government official] to [p]ack his bags. [The Candidate] is the man.” Trump became the presumptive GOP nominee that same day.
By that point, the charging document says, the person who is likely Barrack was back in the U.S., and met with senior Trump campaign officials in New York City that same day.
Though the sought-after meeting between unnamed UAE officials and Trump never took place, the FBI agent wrote in the next paragraph that they tried to hold a meeting in New York City with a topic that may have involved Saudi interests as well.
The complaint goes on to allege further incidents that are described in the Barrack indictment, including an attempt to change a speech that Trump was to deliver so that it was more in line with UAE interests.
The timing of the complaint itself lines up with at least one development in Barrack’s case.
Prosecutors accused Barrack of lying to FBI agents during a June 20, 2019 meeting.
Al-Malik was charged five days later, according to the filing. Prosecutors separately alleged in a filing last week that Al-Malik fled the U.S. in April 2018, after an interview with law enforcement.
In remarks to reporters on Monday, Barrack attorney Matthew Herrington dismissed the case as “based on information that was presented and discussed in my conference room two years ago.”
“He is innocent, and we’re going to prove it in court,” Herrington added.