TX House Passes Bill That Would Label Cards Of Those With O-care Subsidies

FILE - This Nov. 12, 2014 file photo shows the HealthCare.gov website, where people can buy health insurance, on a laptop screen, shown in Portland, Ore. Not only do more Americans have health insurance, but the numb... FILE - This Nov. 12, 2014 file photo shows the HealthCare.gov website, where people can buy health insurance, on a laptop screen, shown in Portland, Ore. Not only do more Americans have health insurance, but the number struggling with medical costs has dropped since President Barack Obama's health care law expanded coverage, according to a study released Thursday Jan. 15, 2015. (AP Photo/Don Ryan, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Texas state House on Monday passed a bill that would add a label to the insurance cards of individuals who purchased health insurance plans via an exchange established through Obamacare.

After the bill cleared an initial vote in the House last week, legislators voted 129-8 to approve the bill in a final vote on Monday, according to the Texas House clerk’s office.

House Bill 1514, sponsored by Republican state Rep. J.D. Sheffield, would add the label “QHP” to the cards of individuals who purchased plans through the exchange, and “QHP-S” for those who receive subsidies.

Supporters of the bill say that the labels will help doctors understand the type of insurance coverage a patient has and remind patients to continue with their insurance payments, according to the Texas Tribune.

Neurologist Dr. Sara Austin testified on behalf of the Texas Medical Association in support of the legislation. In her written testimony, Austin said that insurance companies provide individuals with a 90-day grace period when they fall behind on their payments. Insurance companies must offer insurance for the 90 days, but if the individual does not pay at the end of the three months, insurance companies can terminate the insurance and demand a refund from doctors for the final 60 days of the grace period, according to Austin.

Austin said the label “lets the physician office know that the 90-day grace period applies and provides information necessary for the physician to remind the patient about the importance of continuing to pay his or her portion of the premium.”

However, critics of the bill worry that the labels could lead to discrimination.

“Other than creating a group that you’re going to discriminate against, I don’t see any purpose for indicating that people are getting a subsidy,” Jose E. Camacho, executive director of the Texas Association of Community Health Centers, told the Texas Tribune.

Jamie Dudensing, chief executive of the Texas Association of Health Plans, said insurers are “very concerned” about the bill, according to the Texas Tribune. Dudensing said that the labels could result in doctors discriminating against patients who receive subsidies.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jw1 jw1 says:

    Republicans.
    All discrimination.
    All the time.

    jw1

  2. “However, critics of the bill worry that the labels could lead to discrimination.”

    Duh. That’s PRECISELY what they are designed to do. And then some conservative fucking jackass with chip on his shoulder will do a study that shows “Obamacare recipients receive worse medical treatment and health care options than those with regular market insurance,” concluding that it “proves” that “Obamacare is a failure”…yammering about “something something everyone’s covered, but not all coverage is equal”…completely missing the point that it’s all because conservative doctors in TX deliberately shy away from or give unsatisfactory, cursory treatment to people they see with those labels on their cards because they (a) resent the ACA and/or (b) assume the patient covered by the ACA won’t pay.

  3. WTF?! This is beyond ridiculous! Next for the Texas legislature, golden triangles worn on the chest to mark out ‘those’ people. You know who I mean.

    Although, wasting their time with nonsense like this is the only chance of the campus carry bill not becoming law this session, so silver linings I guess.

  4. Next on their To-Do list:

  5. Came here to say the same thing. Because surely, nobody would use this label to discriminate.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

118 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for slbinva Avatar for thaverly Avatar for craigm Avatar for afblac Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for krusher Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for pdxer Avatar for sniffit Avatar for blueberrytomatosoup Avatar for sgjsdad Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for gr Avatar for ottnott Avatar for zrx1100 Avatar for suicide_arsonist Avatar for exspectator Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for cjonsson Avatar for mazs Avatar for jinnj Avatar for henk Avatar for acme

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: