GOP Rep. Southerland: I Didn’t Read Senate Version Of VAWA

U.S. Rep. Steve Southerland gives a stump speech at Florida State University Panama City in Panama City, Fla., Friday, Oct. 3, 2014. (AP Photo/News Herald, Andrew Wardlow)

Rep. Steve Southerland (R-FL) said he didn’t read the Senate version of a Violence Against Women Act reauthorization, and that was why he voted against it.

Southerland, in an interview with the Tallahassee Democrat’s editorial board, defended that move, saying that the Senate version was different than the House version. The House GOP’s reauthorization version didn’t include expanded protections for gays and lesbians, undocumented immigrants and Native Americans, a change that was widely debated and reported at the time.

“But the bill that was put on the floor, the last VAWA vote, came straight from the Senate, was thrown on the floor, it was a surprise, it wasn’t given to us —there was no forecast that that bill was coming. And I’ll be honest with you I think that was a political maneuver,” Southerland said.

He was then asked in the same interview if he has read the VAWA bill passed by both the House and the Senate.

“No, I haven’t read all the bill. It doesn’t matter. I don’t have it. It’s law. The horse is out of the barn. I mean it’s gone. Okay? And I didn’t have a chance to read it,” Southerland said.

Southerland’s comments come despite the fact that in his re-election campaign he’s angled himself as a strong advocates of women’s rights. His campaign also released an ad saying that he supported reauthorization of VAWA.

The Senate’s bipartisan version of the bill passed the chamber in a vote of 78 to 22 and eventually became law.

Southerland has found himself in a tough re-election fight against Democrat Gwen Graham.

Watch the video below:

22
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Huh? I don’t get why it mattered whether he read the SENATE bill or not - he’s in the HOUSE and voted against the HOUSE bill.

    What a weasel excuse.

    Rep. Steve Southerland (R-FL) said he didn’t read the Senate version of a Violence Against Women Act reauthorization, and that was why he voted against it.

    His campaign also released an ad saying that he supported reauthorization of VAWA.

    /face palm

  2. Perfect. How’s that outreach going, asshole?

  3. If they don’t let you have time to read it- demand the time. Or you know, get a copy BEFORE they have a vote on it.

  4. He seems to be relying on the incompetence defense. He didn’t know what he was voting against.

  5. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    And the thing is, incompetence is an acceptable defense in Congress.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

16 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for jw1 Avatar for marby Avatar for mmurdoch Avatar for doninsd Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for artemisia Avatar for Rob_Monroe Avatar for Patriott Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for winstonsmith Avatar for llamaspit Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for hora_del_cafe Avatar for twowolves Avatar for darrtown

Continue Discussion