RNC Suspends Partnership With NBC News For February Debate

In this Jan. 24, 2014, photo, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus is seen at the RNC winter meeting in Washington. The dueling faces of a conflicted political party were on display for all to see at... In this Jan. 24, 2014, photo, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus is seen at the RNC winter meeting in Washington. The dueling faces of a conflicted political party were on display for all to see at the just-concluded RNC meeting. The reminder of the divisions comes a year after Priebus published a report aimed at modernizing the party and boosting its ranks, and as Republicans eye their best chance at taking control of both houses of Congress since 2002. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This post has been updated.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus told NBC News in a Friday letter that the committee will no longer partner with the network for the February Republican presidential debate.

Citing concerns over the Wednesday night CNBC debate, Priebus wrote that the RNC can not continue to work with NBC for the debate on Feb. 26 until the committee consults with the Republican campaigns. NBC was set to co-host the debate with Telemundo, the Spanish-language media division of NBCUniversal.

“The RNC’s sole role in the primary debate process is to ensure that our candidates are given a full and fair opportunity to lay out their vision for America’s future. We simply cannot continue with NBC without full consultation with our campaigns,” he wrote.

“The CNBC network is one of your media properties, and its handling of the debate was conducted in bad faith,” he continued. “We understand that NBC does not exercise full editorial control over CNBC’s journalistic approach. However, the network is an arm of your organization, and we need to ensure there is not a repeat performance.”

In a Friday statement, NBC News said the network would work with the RNC to resolve any issues.

In the letter to NBC, Priebus railed against the CNBC moderators for failing to focus on financial and economic issues, and he said that the moderators made factual errors and asked “offensive” questions.

“While debates are meant to include tough questions and contrast candidates’ visions and policies for the future of America, CNBC’s moderators engaged in a series of ‘gotcha’ questions, petty and mean-spirited in tone, and designed to embarrass our candidates. What took place Wednesday night was not an attempt to give the American people a greater understanding of our candidates’ policies and ideas,” he wrote.

Priebus wrote that the RNC will still sponsor a debate on Feb. 10, and will continue to work with National Review on the debate.

Following the CNBC debate, the Republican presidential candidates complained heavily about the CNBC moderators’ questions and expressed concern that they were not asked substantive questions. Some conservatives placed blame on the RNC and called for major changes to the debate formats.

A group of candidates, led by Ben Carson’s campaign, plans to meet without the RNC on Sunday to discuss grievances and propose changes to the debate formats going forward, according to a Politico report.

Priebus himself was quick to criticize the CNBC debate as well, describing it Thursday night as a “crap sandwich.”

Read Priebus’ entire letter:

Dear Mr. Lack,

I write to inform you that pending further discussion between the Republican National Committee (RNC) and our presidential campaigns, we are suspending the partnership with NBC News for the Republican primary debate at the University of Houston on February 26, 2016. The RNC’s sole role in the primary debate process is to ensure that our candidates are given a full and fair opportunity to lay out their vision for America’s future. We simply cannot continue with NBC without full consultation with our campaigns.

The CNBC network is one of your media properties, and its handling of the debate was conducted in bad faith. We understand that NBC does not exercise full editorial control over CNBC’s journalistic approach. However, the network is an arm of your organization, and we need to ensure there is not a repeat performance.

CNBC billed the debate as one that would focus on “the key issues that matter to all voters—job growth, taxes, technology, retirement and the health of our national economy.” That was not the case. Before the debate, the candidates were promised an opening question on economic or financial matters. That was not the case. Candidates were promised that speaking time would be carefully monitored to ensure fairness. That was not the case. Questions were inaccurate or downright offensive. The first question directed to one of our candidates asked if he was running a comic book version of a presidential campaign, hardly in the spirit of how the debate was billed.

While debates are meant to include tough questions and contrast candidates’ visions and policies for the future of America, CNBC’s moderators engaged in a series of “gotcha” questions, petty and mean-spirited in tone, and designed to embarrass our candidates. What took place Wednesday night was not an attempt to give the American people a greater understanding of our candidates’ policies and ideas.

I have tremendous respect for the First Amendment and freedom of the press. However, I also expect the media to host a substantive debate on consequential issues important to Americans. CNBC did not.

While we are suspending our partnership with NBC News and its properties, we still fully intend to have a debate on that day, and will ensure that National Review remains part of it.

I will be working with our candidates to discuss how to move forward and will be in touch.

Sincerely,

Reince Priebus
Chairman, Republican National Committee

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for mames5 mames5 says:

    Maybe they can do a podcast instead.

  2. What a bunch of freakin’ trolls the RNC has become.

  3. How about a pre-taped presentation by each of the candidates available on that newfangled thing called “You Tube.” Or, maybe, a live Twitter feed by each of the candidates.

  4. Good. Stop the free advertising for the GOP.

  5. One might wonder whether the planned pre-whining, pre-complaining and pre-criticizing of the debate, followed by turning it into an “attack the media” shitshow at the debate, then having an obviously planned and organized shit-fling at the whole affair was all just kabuki theater designed to give them an excuse for abandoning debates on these other networks and handing them to Faux News instead, so they can play talking point t-ball the whole debate. Yep, one might.

    https://usatthebiglead.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/t-ball-player.gif

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

174 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for abbymac Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for clemmers Avatar for manhattan123 Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for rudesan Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for eduardoinohio Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for bigbraxstone Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for dddinah Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for azjude Avatar for darrtown Avatar for beattycat Avatar for jonney_5

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: