White House Budget Director: ‘Insurance Is Not Really The End Goal Here’ (VIDEO)

UNITED STATES – MARCH 27: Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., speaks during the Republican Study Committee news conference to unveil a FY2013 budget proposal on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (... UNITED STATES – MARCH 27: Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., speaks during the Republican Study Committee news conference to unveil a FY2013 budget proposal on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The director of the Office of Management and Budget said Wednesday that Republicans wouldn’t use insurance coverage numbers as the ultimate metric for the success of the proposal to replace Obamacare.

On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Mark Halperin asked Mick Mulvaney, President Donald Trump’s OMB director, for a “range of estimate of how many fewer people will have health insurance” under House Republicans’ proposed Replacement for Obamacare.

“We’re looking at it in a different way, Mark, because insurance is not really the end goal here, is it?” Mulvaney responded. “It’s one of the conservatives’ – one of the Republicans’ complaints about the Affordable Care Act from the very beginning: It was a great way to get insurance and a lousy way to actually be able to go to the doctor.”

“So we’re choosing instead to look at what we think is more important to ordinary people: Can they afford to go to the doctor? And we are convinced it will be possible for more people to get better care at the doctor under this this plan than it was under Obamacare.”

That is a slightly different metric than the one set out by President Donald Trump to the Washington Post in January: “Insurance for everybody … Much less expensive and much better.”

Asked about that specific pledge Wednesday, Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price, the White House’s point person for the health care overhaul, said “that’s certainly the goal.”

But Price specified, when asked about patients who stood to pay more out-of-pocket without Obamacare’s subsidies, that lowering the cost of coverage itself was a higher priority than the amount of assistance the government provided people to pay for it.

Watch the exchange below via MSNBC:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. With that kind of financial insight, I wouldn’t trust this douchebag to cash in my loose change at the bank.

  2. I nearly fell off my chair when I read this. So, how are “ordinary people” going to be able to afford to go to the doctor without insurance?

    Are they dropping doctors’ pay to minimum wage? A minimum wage earner might just then be able to pay for 15 mins of a doctor’s time…

    Are they discontinuing pharma CEOs bonuses and channeling that money into doctors’ pockets so that people can pay the doctors less?

    WTF??? How stupid do they think we are, anyway?

    (rhetorical question)

  3. “So we’re choosing instead to look at what we think is more important to ordinary people: Can they afford to go to the doctor? And we are convinced it will be possible for more people to get better care at the doctor under this this plan than it was under Obamacare.”

    OK. How will this bill do that exactly? Does it limit what Doctors and Hospitals can charge?

  4. Avatar for jte jte says:

    Um, wait. So according to Mulvaney, the idea here is that it will somehow be cheaper/easier to go to the doctor if you don’t have any insurance?

    WTF?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

148 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for fgs Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for marby Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for damiana Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for emjayay Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for rb639 Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for darrtown Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for jte Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for birdford Avatar for canyoncountry Avatar for greysea Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for bobef Avatar for drtv

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: