UVA Dean: Rolling Stone’s Retracted Rape Story ‘Damaged My Reputation’

University of Virginia Associate Dean Nicole Eramo slammed Rolling Stone for damaging her reputation in its retracted blockbuster article "A Rape On Campus."
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A University of Virginia dean on Wednesday wrote an open letter that slammed Rolling Stone for damaging her reputation and falsely portraying her work in a now-retracted article about an alleged gang rape at a fraternity on campus.

The Washington Post obtained a letter that Associate Dean of Students Nicole Eramo, who heads up the school’s Sexual Misconduct Board, addressed to Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner. Eramo wrote that the magazine provided a “false and grossly misleading portrayal of the counseling and support that I provided to Jackie,” the subject of the article who alleged that she was horrifically gang-raped at a frat house party.

“Using me as the personification of a heartless administration, the Rolling Stone article attacked my life’s work,” Eramo wrote.

The letter marked Eramo’s first public comments since the magazine story, “A Rape On Campus,” was published in November. The magazine retracted it earlier this month after the Columbia Journalism School released a scathing external review that determined the magazine made fundamental errors in its reporting, editing and fact-checking processes.

Eramo described dealing with rape and death threats of her own after the article sparked a nationwide conversation about college administrators’ response to sexual assaults on campus.

“Inflamed by the false portrayal in the article, protesters showed up at my office, demanding I be fired,” she wrote. “Perhaps most egregious and shocking were the emails that I received expressing hope that I be killed or raped, and commenting that they hoped that I had a daughter so that she could be raped.”

Eramo also mentioned in the letter that she had met with Rolling Stone’s attorneys in February and felt that the magazine did not adequately address her and the university’s concerns. The Washington Post noted in its report that Eramo had retained legal counsel from a Washington, D.C. law firm specializing in defamation cases, which indicates that the magazine could potentially face a lawsuit down the road.

Rolling Stone did not respond to a request for comment from the Washington Post.

Read the whole letter here.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Wonder how many of the people who denounced and smeared her have personally apologized for what they did. The fact that Rolling Stone will be writing her a big check isn’t really in doubt, but what about all the people who attacked her? Have they realized the mistake they made in jumping to conclusions, or have they already forgotten what they did after blaming someone else?

  2. Exactly. “Cash” is only part of an apology. The “real” part is a direct statement to those you wronged.

  3. Not fair.

    They didn’t “jump” to conclustions and you are very wrong in misstating that. Rolling Stone libeled this woman. People trusted the written, edited, and published word of a respected publication, and had no way of knowing or foreseeing it is was raw, unverified libel. She is a big victim, but those who accosted her are also smaller victims of Rolling Stone’s indefensible wanton misconduct.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for mrcomments

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: