College Board To Release New Edition Of Controversial AP History Course

College Board will released a new edition of the AP U.S. History exam this summer following significant backlash from conservatives, who decried the new framework for the course as too negative and “revisionist.”

“This summer, the College Board will release a new edition of the course framework which will clarify and encourage a balanced approach to the teaching of American history, while remaining faithful to the requirements that colleges and universities set for academic credit,” Trevor Packer, College Board’s senior vice president for AP, wrote in a letter in the Wall Street Journal.

It’s not clear what College Board will change in the course framework. The company already addressed concerns about the exam in October 2013 by releasing revised instructions. The instructions made it clear to teachers that they can choose what to include in the course and can “focus in depth on such essential content such as the Founding Documents, WWII, key leaders in the civil rights movement.”

Packer announced that the College Board would release a new edition of the exam while responding to an op-ed written by Lynne Cheney criticizing the exam.

“While there has been a great deal of misinformation and misunderstanding about the current AP U.S. history course framework, there has also been principled and thoughtful feedback,” Packer wrote in his letter. “Given the substantive feedback we have received from educators and the general public representing a range of political viewpoints, we are confident that the concerns some have expressed this past year—including those of Mrs. Cheney—will be resolved by the new framework.”

College Board accepted public feedback on the exam through February, and will release the results from the public comments this summer.

College Board initially released its new framework in October 2012, prompting backlash from conservatives about changes to the course.

The Republican National Committee condemned the course’s “consistently negative view of American history” in August. Numerous states and school districts then followed suit in denouncing the exam, including Oklahoma and Georgia.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: