GOP Sen. Murkowski Backtracks On Giving Obama’s SCOTUS Nom A Hearing

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 27: Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, speaks with reporters after the Senate luncheons in the Capitol, January 27, 2016. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Moderate GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski (AK), one of the few Republicans initially willing to break ranks on whether President Obama’s nominee to succeed Antonin Scalia should be considered, reversed course Thursday evening. In a series of Tweets she said “the American people will be weighing in on the direction of SCOTUS” in the upcoming election and that Obama should “allow his successor to select the next Supreme Court justice.”

Murkowski previously told reporters that Obama’s nominee to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia deserved at least some level of Senate consideration in the form of a hearing, even if the Senate ultimately decided not to bring him or her to the vote.

“I do believe that the nominee should get a hearing,” Murkowski said Wednesday, according to a report in the Alaska Dispatch News. “That doesn’t necessarily mean that that ends up in a vote. The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether or not this individual, based on their record … should be named to the highest court in the land.”

Since Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) signaled almost immediately after reports of Scalia’s death that he intended to delay any confirmation proceedings until after a new president is inaugurated, most of his fellow Republicans — who also face pressure from outside conservative groups — have fallen into line.

As for the “tradition embraced by both parties” Murkowski referred to in her Tweet Thursday, the historical record of the last century shows no such tradition. According to SCOTUSblog, at no time since 1900 has the Senate failed to confirm a nominee purely because a presidential election was less than a year away and five nominees were confirmed by the Senate within a presidential election year.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for dswx dswx says:

    Since she is claiming that they should not follow the Constitution, a. it does not get more un-American than that, and b. she is anything but “moderate”.

  2. As for the “tradition embraced by both parties” Murkowski referred to in
    her Tweet Thursday, the historical record of the last century shows no
    such tradition.

    <img src=">

  3. Obama better listen to us otherwise we will not follow the constitution.

  4. There. Is. No. Precedent.

    Ask her to point out the last time a President did nothing to fill a vacancy, because it was too close to an election.

    My quick review showed it was in 1860.

  5. Another gutless member of the Repulsive Party toes the line!

Continue the discussion at

149 more replies


Avatar for alliebean Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for jdkahler Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for inversion Avatar for mantan Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for donnyyoung Avatar for ottnott Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for exspectator Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for beattycat Avatar for jalus Avatar for magidin Avatar for cola

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: