Led By Texas, Seven Attorneys General Sue Federal Government Over DACA

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton holds a joint press conference Feb. 18, 2015 with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, l, to address a Texas federal court's decision on the lawsuit filed by 26 states challenging President Obama... Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton holds a joint press conference Feb. 18, 2015 with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, l, to address a Texas federal court's decision on the lawsuit filed by 26 states challenging President Obama's executive action on immigration. Paxton was indicted Aug. 3, 2015 on three counts of securities fraud not related to his official duties. (Photo by Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images) MORE LESS

Republican attorneys general from seven states sued the federal government on Tuesday over the continued existence of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which two judges have ordered must continue to process renewal applications and, after a third judge’s ruling last week, may soon have to accept new applications as well.

The program, instituted during the Obama administration, protects qualified young undocumented people from deportation.

The attorneys general, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (pictured above), were all among the group of nine attorneys general who threatened to sue the Trump administration over DACA last year before Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the program’s termination.

However, while the attorneys general from Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina and West Virginia sued on Tuesday, two states represented in the previous group did not: Idaho and Kansas. Tennessee’s attorney general, though initially part of the group of attorneys general threatening to sue in 2017, ultimately withdrew that threat days before Sessions announced DACA’s termination. Tennessee is not represented in Tuesday’s lawsuit, either.

The plaintiff states requested the following:

A. An order enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewing any DACA permits in the future;

B. A declaratory judgment that DACA violates the Take Care Clause;

C. A declaratory judgment that DACA is procedurally unlawful under the APA;

D. A declaratory judgment that DACA is substantively unlawful under the APA; and

E. Any and all other relief to which Plaintiff States may be entitled.

Read a copy of the suit, via law professor Josh Blackman, here.

59
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Priceless…

  2. Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina and West Virginia

    Not to let Texas and Nebraska totally off the hook, but man, that is one august set of deplorables.

  3. The phrase “no standing” is about to become a drinking game.

    States have no say in immigration programs. None. Zero.

  4. Racists demand their wishes be honored. No need to make it sound any nicer, not in the era of Trump.

    If they want to stand for it proudly, I’m more than happy to toss it right back at them, I rather hope the Republicans choke on it for the next several generations.

  5. So, they are suing the federal government to get an injunction from a federal court to stop it from doing what 3 federal courts have ordered it to keep doing.

    Who put the acid in my tea?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

53 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for cmbudinger Avatar for ghost Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for meri Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for byteme Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for cometboy Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for tecmage Avatar for lastroth Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for rickjones Avatar for noonm Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for katscherger Avatar for socalista Avatar for maximus Avatar for erik_t

Continue Discussion