Trump Spox Suggests Trump’s Sister Could Be ‘Biased’ As A Female Judge

Katrina Pierson
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Donald Trump’s national spokeswoman on Monday suggested that Trump’s own sister, a judge on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, could be biased as a result of her gender.

“If somebody were to say to her she was biased in regard to some case because she’s a woman, that would be awful, wouldn’t it?” CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked Katrina Pierson of Trump’s sister, Maryanne Trump Barry.

“Well, it would depend on her past and decisions she made as a judge,” Pierson replied. “There is no question that there are activist judges in this country.”

Trump has pushed this stance heavily in the last few weeks, arguing that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who is overseeing a fraud case involving the now-defunct Trump University, is “biased” against him because of his “Mexican” heritage. The presumptive GOP nominee took this identity-based argument for unfair treatment further on Monday, arguing that a Muslim judge could “absolutely” be biased against him, too, because of his proposal to temporarily ban Muslim immigration to the United States.

As Blitzer pointed out, many of Trump’s fiercest supporters urged him to drop the racial attacks, which they say alienate minority voters and undermine the independence of the judiciary.

Pierson said Trump had no plan to “start saying and doing what everybody else says to say and do.”

“He is not backing down because the media wants to pressure, call him names, call him racist,” Pierson said. “Doesn’t matter which GOP individual comes out, they’re not there and they don’t have the facts. That’s why Mr. Trump is the nominee.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. the only unbiased judges are conservative white males. Got it.

  2. Actually its scarier than that - “the only unbiased judges are those that agree with me” - this is the basis of authoritarianism

  3. I want this election OVER so I never have to look on or hear this reprehensible ‘person’ again. ‘… they’re not there and they don’t have the facts’…which ‘facts’ are those?

  4. and they have to be heterosexual… no homosexuals…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

74 more replies

Participants

Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for waldem Avatar for ignatius_donnelly Avatar for barkingdogs3 Avatar for sysprog Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for chammy Avatar for sconosciuto Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for joelopines Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for leeks Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for benthere Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jordanolsen26 Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for home_invader

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: