Katie Couric Apologizes For ‘Misleading’ Edits In Gun Control Documentary (AUDIO)

FILE - In this Jan. 26, 2016 file photo, filmmaker Stephanie Soechtig, left, and journalist Katie Couric pose for a portrait to promote the film, "Under the Gun", during the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah.... FILE - In this Jan. 26, 2016 file photo, filmmaker Stephanie Soechtig, left, and journalist Katie Couric pose for a portrait to promote the film, "Under the Gun", during the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. The film will debut on May 15 on Epix. (Photo by Matt Sayles/Invision/AP, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Days after right-wing bloggers found that a new documentary about gun violence produced by Katie Couric was edited to make it appear Couric’s question left pro-gun activists speechless, the Yahoo News anchor admitted the edit was “misleading.”

In “Under the Gun,” a documentary that made its TV debut on May 15, Couric asks members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League: “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from walking into, say a licensed gun dealer and purchasing a gun?”

Director Stephanie Soechtig edited the segment to include about eight seconds of silence after the question as the activists avert their eyes and look at each other, CNN reported.

But in raw audio of the interview obtained by the Free Beacon, the activists respond without pausing. The edits were first reported by Ammoblog, a pro-gun site.

In a statement posted online Monday night, Couric said she raised concerns about the pause during a screening of the film with Soechtig, who told Couric the “beat” was added for “dramatic effect.”

“I regret that those eight seconds were misleading and that I did not raise my initial concerns more vigorously,” she wrote.

Amid the controversy, Soechtig said she “never intended to make anyone look bad” and said the pause was meant to provide viewers with “a moment to consider this important question.”

Watch the edited version of the clip via CNN:

AP photo: Soechtig and Couric

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from walking into, say a licensed gun dealer and purchasing a gun?”

    This kerfuffle was over something as trivial as terrorists buying guns without having to endure any sort of background check whatsoever?!?! Goddamn some people have effed up priorities!
  2. “the pause was meant to provide viewers with “a moment to consider this important question.””

    Well, since pausing to consider the question is precisely what the NRA and its ammosexual army don’t want anyone doing under any circumstances whatsoever, you pretty much just admitted…at least as far as they are concerned…that the pause was deliberate liberal gun-grabber propaganda.

  3. Of course, an open gun show is the best place to stock up. Especially during their “Tub-O-Guns” sale special!

  4. my take away from this is that people never learn…

    how many times have we heard that the coverup is often worse than whatever happened? then politicians and corporations continue to do it…

    news people… mis-leading or false edits… Dan Rather and his ‘W’ scoop… NBC and their false edit… even the Planned Parenthood story with the selective editing…

    then we wonder why people are skeptical and/or cynical…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

27 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for booch221 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for victorabrahamsen Avatar for webcelt Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sooner Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for chammy Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for noamsane Avatar for sniffit Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for dorado Avatar for jcblues Avatar for jaybeeraybee

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: