Spox ‘Can’t Imagine’ Obama Dropping Garland If Dem Wins In November

White House press secretary Josh Earnest answers a question about ongoing budget negotiations during the daily press briefing, Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2015, at the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

During the White House press briefing on Friday, spokesman Josh Earnest indicated that President Obama would not withdraw support from Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland if he was asked to do so by a Democratic president-elect.

“The President stands by his nominee and believes that the Senate should confirm him as soon as possible. And I cannot imagine a scenario where the President would withdraw his support from his nominee,” Earnest said when asked whether Obama would pull support for his nominee so that his successor could name a different nominee.

Earnest also told reporters that Obama “believes strongly that Chief Judge Garland is the right person for this job.”

“The President is proud to have nominated him, and the President will stand by him and urge the United states Senate to confirm him promptly,” he said.

With some Senate Republicans publicly saying they’d consider confirming Garland in a lame duck session after the November election if a Democrat wins, there’s been idle speculation that Obama could one-up them by withdrawing Garland at that time and submitting a younger more progressive nominee. But the question to Earnest was prompted by Bernie Sanders telling MSNBC on Thursday that if he is elected president, he would ask Obama to withdraw Garland.

“I’m 100 percent prepared to support Judge Garland. I think he’s clearly very knowledgable and can serve ably on the Supreme Court, but between you and me, I think there are some more progressive judges out there,” the Democratic presidential candidate said.

50
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I also suspect the President would not withdraw support for Garland. If anything happens on that end, it’ll be Garland withdrawing his name after being tired of being toyed with or the Senate’s dam breaking, them having a vote on him, and rejecting him nonetheless.

  2. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    Exactly what I said on another thread. It’s just not in this President’s DNA to use people as pawns in a political game. He’s simply too dignified and classy for that.

    Republicans on the other hand…

  3. This gives Republicans incentive to stonewall until the election. Heh heh heh…

  4. Meh. It’s a long way off. Depends what happens between here and there, and what Hillary asks of him then.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

44 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for paulw Avatar for ealleniii Avatar for jcs Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for sysprog Avatar for smiley Avatar for humpback Avatar for navamske Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for jinx_tpm Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for sniffit Avatar for eastlansing Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for mxyztplk Avatar for astralfire Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for quax Avatar for seedoubleyou Avatar for pshah Avatar for canary02 Avatar for landshark2897

Continue Discussion