Gowdy Responds To DOJ IG Report On 2016 Activity: ‘Not The FBI I Know’

on June 28, 2016 in Washington, DC.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images North America

House Oversight Committee Chair Trey Gowdy (R-SC) on Thursday criticized the FBI and its former director, James Comey, after receiving an Department of Justice inspector general’s report on the FBI and DOJ’s actions during the 2016 election.

This is not the FBI I know,” Gowdy said. “This is not the FBI our country needs. This is not the FBI citizens and suspects alike deserve.”

The rest of Gowdy’s statement (read it in full below) addresses the major headlines out of the IG report so far, criticizing Comey’s handling of the Clinton email investigation, as the IG did.

“The investigation was mishandled,” Gowdy said. “The investigatory conclusions were reached before the end of the witness interviews. The July 5th press conference marked a serious violation of policy and process. And the letters to Congress in the fall of 2016 were both delayed in substance and unnecessary in form.”

He additionally criticized the FBI for the “[v]oluntariness and consent” it showed Clinton and other “potential subjects and targets” in the investigation of Clinton’s private email server, contrasting them to the “search warrants, subpoenas, and other compulsory processes” in the investigation of the Trump campaign.

Read Gowdy’s full statement below:

“I am alarmed, angered, and deeply disappointed by the Inspector General’s finding of numerous failures by DOJ and FBI in investigating potential Espionage Act violations by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

This report confirms investigative decisions made by the FBI during the pendency of this investigation were unprecedented and deviated from traditional investigative procedures in favor of a much more permissive and voluntary approach. This is not the way normal investigations are run. 

The investigation was mishandled. The investigatory conclusions were reached before the end of the witness interviews. The July 5th press conference marked a serious violation of policy and process. And the letters to Congress in the fall of 2016 were both delayed in substance and unnecessary in form. 

Moreover, the treatment afforded to former Secretary Clinton and other potential subjects and targets was starkly different from the FBI’s investigation into Trump campaign officials. Voluntariness and consent in the former were replaced with search warrants, subpoenas, and other compulsory processes in the latter. Many of the investigators and supervisors were the same in both investigations but the investigatory tactics were not. 

Former Director Comey violated Department policy in several significant ways. The FBI’s actions and those of former Director Comey severely damaged the credibility of the investigation, the public’s ability to rely on the results of the investigation, and the very institutions he claims to revere. 

The report also conclusively shows an alarming and destructive level of animus displayed by top officials at the FBI. Peter Strzok’s manifest bias trending toward animus casts a pall on this investigation. Bias is so pernicious and malignant as to both taint the process, the result, and the ability to have confidence in either. His bias was so pervasive and toxic as to call into question any other investigations he was part of including his role in the investigation of what Russia did in 2016. His bias impacted his decision making and he assigned to himself the role of stopping the Trump campaign or ending a Trump Presidency. 

The law enforcement community has no greater ally in Congress than me. But continued revelations of questionable decision making by FBI and DOJ leadership destroys confidence in the impartiality of the institutions I have long served, respected, and believed in. 

This is not the FBI I know. This is not the FBI our country needs. This is not the FBI citizens and suspects alike deserve. 

It is now urgently incumbent on Attorney General Sessions and Director Wray to take decisive action to restore Americans’ confidence in our justice system.”

Comments