Missouri GOPer Compares Abortion To Buying A Car, Picking Carpeting

National Football League representative Kenneth Edmonds, left, urges members of the Senate Committee on Health, Mental Health, Seniors and Families to support legislation to improve awareness of sports-related concus... National Football League representative Kenneth Edmonds, left, urges members of the Senate Committee on Health, Mental Health, Seniors and Families to support legislation to improve awareness of sports-related concussions in young athletes Tuesday morning, May 3, 2011, at the State Capitol in Jefferson City, Mo. The bill's House sponsor, Rep. Chuck Gatschenberger, R-Lake St. Louis, is seated at right.(AP Photo/Kelley McCall) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Republican lawmaker in Missouri who is sponsoring a bill that would mandate women seeking an abortion undergo an ultrasound and wait three days for the procedure defended his measure Tuesday, suggesting a woman getting an abortion should treat it with the same deliberation as shopping for cars or carpeting.

State Rep. Chuck Gatschenberger (R) explained to his colleagues on the Missouri House’s Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities committee that when he goes to buy a new vehicle, he doesn’t just make a snap decision.

“I have to look at it, get information about it, maybe drive it, you know, a lot of different things. Check prices,” he said, according to video recorded by Progress Missouri. “There’s lots of things that I do putting into a decision. Whether that’s a car, whether that’s a house, whether that’s any major decision that I put in my life. Even carpeting.”

“I was faced with a decision that I didn’t have very much information that I knew about,” he added. “So I wanted to be as informed as possible, and that’s what this bill is. Giving them as much information as possible.”

State Rep. Stacey Newman (D) called Gatschenberger out on the car comparison in a testy exchange.

“Are you equating that with a medical decision?” she asked Gatschenberger.

“No–” Gatschenberger said.

“That was your analogy, and that was extremely offense to every single woman in this hearing, representative,” Newman said. “Your comments were extremely offensive to every single woman sitting in here, whether they’re pregnant or whether they’re not. I want to point that out, because that kind of attitude is demeaning to women, regardless of what they decide to do.”

“That was not the intention. I apologize for that,” Gatschenberger responded.

But Gatschenberger was pressing Newman to reconsider the bill seconds later.

“I’m just saying this is a life-ending decision,” he said. “You should think about it.”

h/t Mother Jones

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: