Scientific American Editor Has Proof Fox Told Him Not To Talk Climate Change

Scientific American Editor: Fox Told Me I Couldn't Talk About Climate Change
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Fox News denied on Wednesday that a producer had “specifically” told an editor for Scientific American magazine that he should avoid discussing climate change in a “Fox & Friends” segment that aired earlier in the day about future tech trends.

After appearing on “Fox & Friends” Wednesday morning, Michael Moyer tweeted that he had wanted to talk about the impacts of climate change as a future trend but was “told to pick something else” by a producer at the show. He later wrote a fuller account of his experience for his Scientific American blog.

Moyer also told TPM he chose to share his experience after deciding that he wouldn’t appear on the show again.

“I found the tone and topics of coverage while I was sitting in the green room this morning to be not something that I wanted to be a part of in the future,” he said. “I didn’t realize that the drumbeat of conservative propaganda was so ubiquitous on the show.”

A Fox spokesperson sent TPM a statement on Wednesday afternoon denying that climate change was ever an issue.

“We invited Michael on for a segment on technological and scientific trends we can expect in the future. We worked closely with him and his team and there was never an issue on the topic of climate change,” Suzanne Scott, senior vice president of programming at Fox News, said in the statement. “To say he was told specifically not to discuss it, would be false.”

In response to Fox’s side of the story, Moyer told TPM the producer had explicitly mentioned climate change.

“The exact quote from the Fox producer, in an email, was ‘can we replace the climate change with something else?'” Moyer wrote in an email.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. It’s in an email and can be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt. It’s a damn good thing you’re not in court.

  2. This whole event will be the subject of Al Franken’s next book, Denials and the Denying Deniers who Deny Them.

  3. They made broad hints in the murky, rain-filled Green Room:
    Those little coffee creamer cups were filled with sand, coffee weak and tepid.
    Bagels & donuts spelled out ‘Science Sucks’.
    FOX A/C was on and running cold under fluorescent lights.
    The ‘Friends’ and crew all had horrible intestinal gas.

  4. “To say he was told specifically not to discuss it, would be false.”

    Ah, there’s nothin’ like fancy smart-mouth lawyer talk, is there?

  5. Oh, those pesky liberal facts once again. Constantly interfering with the RWNJ echo-chamber.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

34 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jack_russell Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for druid800 Avatar for doninsd Avatar for deckbose Avatar for lew Avatar for lonewolf_93 Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for gjdodger Avatar for firstprime Avatar for trnc Avatar for sconosciuto Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for legion Avatar for doggo Avatar for mantan Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for weatherservo9 Avatar for Prof_B_in_LA Avatar for apotropoxy Avatar for jmann Avatar for seedoubleyou Avatar for bigshow

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: