Cantor Campaign Spent More On Steak Houses Than Opponent Spent On Entire Race

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va., right, accompanied by House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 12, 2011, as the budget talks continued... House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va., right, accompanied by House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 12, 2011, as the budget talks continued. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s (R-VA) re-election campaign spent more money at steak houses than David Brat, who ended up defeating Cantor in the Republican primary, spent on his whole campaign.

NBC noted that according to FEC campaign finance reports, Cantor spent $168,637 in payments at BLT Steak and Bobby Van’s Steak House in 17 payments up to May 21.

By contrast Brat’s campaign spent $122,793 in the race.

Cantor also raised far more than Brat in the race. Cantor campaign raised $5,447,290 and spent almost as much — $5,026,626. Brat raised just $206,663.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. If you are going to lose, at least serve a nice meal. That Cantor - so classy.

  2. If Cantor was so confident in his victory, why did he feel he needed to raise $5M? Clearly he raised money just for the sake of it, and viewed it as a way to supplement his income.

    While I’m glad he lost, since I can’t stand the guy, having one more bagger means we are that much closer to default the next time the debt ceiling needs to be raised.

  3. RED.MEAT.MMMMMMmmmmmm

  4. Its how it all works. Leadership guys have access to lots of donors, and are expected to spend it via republican consultants. That’s how you become and stay in leadership…lots of monetary favors out there.

    Which is why this has never happened before. Leadership is safe because they are so well insulated with the money and favors that makes the whole party work. For someone in his position to lose to an outsider in a primary…is nearly unfathomable.

    Its going to be interesting to see just how Brat ran his campaign. I am guessing at this point that it was seriously invested in shoe leather and knocking on doors…ie, ground game.

    More and more the ad buying, back scratching consultant strategy that republicans love to employ are turning up zeros. Ground games with the power of micro targeting is the way to invest in a campaign.

    And late night strategy meetings at Krystal’s isn’t just easier on the budget than steak house meetings…its the stuff that inspires the volunteers knocking on all those doors.

  5. @DaveyJones64 : Great insight, thanks.

    It’s possible Brat didn’t do anything and simply lucked into it if people couldn’t stand Cantor and would vote for anyone but him.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

24 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for bigpoppajumbo Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for wiscojoe Avatar for rogu3ish Avatar for semiotix Avatar for sylhines Avatar for mcbain Avatar for tomdibble Avatar for jinx_tpm Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for snarkus_aurelius Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for xpat4321 Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for angel777 Avatar for derpa

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: