Assemblyman: Records Refute Christie’s ‘False’ Claim About Traffic Jam Scandal

Another one of Chris Christie’s explanations for the growing scandal over lane closures on the George Washington Bridge that led to days of gridlock in Fort Lee, N.J., in September is being questioned by other local officials. 

In a press conference last Thursday, Christie claimed Fort Lee officials gave “no notification” about the traffic jams to Pat Foye, the executive director of Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which oversees the bridge. Assemblyman John Wisnieswki (D), who is chairman of New Jersey Assembly Transportation Committee, which is investigating the incident, told TPM Monday that Christie’s claim was “false.”

“The governor’s claim that Fort Lee did not try to contact them is false and the records reflect that,” said Wisnieswki, who has been examining correspondence subpoenaed from multiple Port Authority officials.

Some Democrats have alleged the lanes were closed because Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich declined to endorse Christie’s re-election bid

One record that seems to call Christie’s claim into question is a letter published by the Wall Street Journal in October. In that letter, which was dated Sept. 12, while the lane closures were still in effect, Sokolich alerts one og Christie’s top appointees at Port Authority, Bill Baroni, to the traffic issues. In addition to contacting Baroni, Sokolich also wrote that Fort Lee officials had made “multiple inquiries” to Port Authority.

“I have incessantly attempted to contact Port Authority representatives to no avail,” Sokolich wrote in the letter. 

On Friday, Sokolich told the Bergen Record newspaper that local officials “incessantly called” and tried to reach “at least five or six” people at the Port Authority to raise concerns about the traffic.

Sokolich declined to comment on the issue when TPM reached him on Monday. Christie’s office has not responded to a request for comment on the discrepancies between the governor’s statements and Sokolich’s. 

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: