Second Circuit Rehears Arguments On Criminal Subpoena For Trump’s Tax Returns

September 25, 2020
Washington, DC. - August 6, 2020: President Trump address the press before departing the White House on Thursday, August 6, 2020, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Demetrius Freeman /The Washington Post via Getty Images)
|
September 25, 2020

This morning the Second Circuit is hearing, for the second time, arguments in President Trump’s attempt to block a state criminal subpoena for his financial records to his longtime accountant Mazars USA LLP. After the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s argument in July that the President is immune to any criminal investigation — and, in this case, an investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance — it gave the President leave to raise further arguments, apparently indefinitely. 

Today, Judges Robert Katzmann, Pierre Leval, and Raymond Lohier Jr. are set to hear arguments in the case, after a district court judge rejected Trump’s bid to throw out the subpoena last month. Follow along below.

Watch Live

The court has a livestream here.

What to Watch

Vance has periodically dropped hints of the scope of his investigation, saying that he may be investigating crimes including tax and insurance fraud.

This is the same court which, last year, asked an attorney for Trump whether the President could be investigated by the NYPD were he to shoot someone on Fifth Avenue. “No,” was the response.

 

More Less

This morning the Second Circuit is hearing, for the second time, arguments in President Trump’s attempt to block a state criminal subpoena for his financial records to his longtime accountant Mazars USA LLP. After the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s argument in July that the President is immune to any criminal investigation — and, in this case, an investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance — it gave the President leave to raise further arguments, apparently indefinitely. 

Today, Judges Robert Katzmann, Pierre Leval, and Raymond Lohier Jr. are set to hear arguments in the case, after a district court judge rejected Trump’s bid to throw out the subpoena last month. Follow along below.

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for reggid reggid says:

    Ticksky tocksky, Comrade Motherfuckersky.

  2. Consovoy is arguing that the subpoena is faulty in two ways: it’s an “overbroad fishing expedition” and it was issued “in bad faith to harass the President.”

    That seems awfully weak.

  3. Avatar for mec mec says:

    download

  4. "He added that Trump has not “set forth evidence that would justify staying the subpoena or quashing it,”

    LOL…

    ETA: And I mean it…that’s it right there. The hearing opened with a reveal of the basis for their decision. These kkklowns are just flinging around accusations and presumptions willy nilly with nothing to back them up.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

44 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for paulw Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for epicurus Avatar for becca656 Avatar for dont Avatar for sniffit Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for milord Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for 1american Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for nycabj Avatar for katscherger Avatar for drtv Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for mec Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: