Russia Strikes Western Ukraine As Infamous Convoy Repositions

March 14, 2022
Ukrainians inside a bunker in Lviv, following the air raid alarm, amid Russian invasion of Ukraine, in Lviv, Ukraine, 11 March 2022. Russian attacks on Ukraine have continued on many cities, despite efforts of the Ru... Ukrainians inside a bunker in Lviv, following the air raid alarm, amid Russian invasion of Ukraine, in Lviv, Ukraine, 11 March 2022. Russian attacks on Ukraine have continued on many cities, despite efforts of the Russian government and Ukrainian authorities to come up with ceasefire agreements and international condemnation on Russian military invasion. (Photo by Ceng Shou Yi/NurPhoto via Getty Images) MORE LESS
|
March 14, 2022

Is the Russian offensive grinding to a halt? Or is this a calm before the storm?

That’s the question before us today, as Russian advances on Ukrainian territory have slowed dramatically over the past week.

To some, that’s of a piece with potential softening in Russian rhetoric around the war. The Kremlin’s spokesman didn’t mention the “denazification” of Ukraine as part of Russia’s war goals during a briefing this week, and Vladimir Putin himself said on Friday that he saw some “positive shifts” in Ukraine’s position. President Zelensky told ABC this week that he had “cooled off” on Ukraine joining NATO, a key Russian talking point.

Alternatively, everything may be about to get far, far worse.

Satellite imaging company Maxar released photos on Thursday suggesting that Russia had repositioned its infamously stalled convoy to launch artillery strikes on and storm Kyiv. The Kremlin launched missiles at far western Ukraine, while the White House warned that Russia may be about to deploy a chemical weapons attack. And while negotiations between Russia and Ukraine continue, it’s not clear that the Kremlin’s core goals have really changed. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed at talks in Turkey on Thursday that Russia “did not attack Ukraine.”

In either scenario, it seems that this stage of the conflict may be at an inflection point: is this a point from which we’ll see a big comedown? Or a prelude to something far, far worse?

More Less

Is the Russian offensive grinding to a halt? Or is this a calm before the storm?

That’s the question before us today, as Russian advances on Ukrainian territory have slowed dramatically over the past week.

To some, that’s of a piece with potential softening in Russian rhetoric around the war. The Kremlin’s spokesman didn’t mention the “denazification” of Ukraine as part of Russia’s war goals during a briefing this week, and Vladimir Putin himself said on Friday that he saw some “positive shifts” in Ukraine’s position. President Zelensky told ABC this week that he had “cooled off” on Ukraine joining NATO, a key Russian talking point.

Alternatively, everything may be about to get far, far worse.

Satellite imaging company Maxar released photos on Thursday suggesting that Russia had repositioned its infamously stalled convoy to launch artillery strikes on and storm Kyiv. The Kremlin launched missiles at far western Ukraine, while the White House warned that Russia may be about to deploy a chemical weapons attack. And while negotiations between Russia and Ukraine continue, it’s not clear that the Kremlin’s core goals have really changed. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed at talks in Turkey on Thursday that Russia “did not attack Ukraine.”

In either scenario, it seems that this stage of the conflict may be at an inflection point: is this a point from which we’ll see a big comedown? Or a prelude to something far, far worse?

Notable Replies

  1. Unfortunately, it seems like this is the likely outcome.

    Nothing worse than a cornered rat.

    Speaking of rats…

  2. Whatever Russia does, the West’s task remains essentially unaltered and that is to make continuation of this war, and any short-term victory, such a huge net loss for Russia that nothing like it will happen for a long, long time and that includes seeing to it that Putin cannot offload any of that cost.


    ETA (tl/dr;)
  3. The White House is picking up on an idea from climate activist and author Bill McKibben to help reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian energy. In late February, McKibben wrote that President Joe Biden should invoke the Defense Production Act to scale up U.S. manufacturing of heat pumps, devices that can heat and cool homes with electricity rather than natural gas, and ship them to Europe.

    Hey, I’d install a heat pump in a second if there were federal subsidies to increase energy independence.

    This is a Naomi Klein “shock doctrine” moment that would allow us to develop alternative energy sources and reduce global warming.

    “More of this, please!”
    – My hypothetical grandchildren

  4. Success depends on the percentage of European homes that have central heat and air.

    Only about 5% have air conditioning, and gas space heaters are common. There are about 23 million heat pumps in all of Europe.

  5. I can imagine the Fox headlines, though…

    image

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

405 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jw1 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jtx Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for godwit Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for osprey Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for gargoyle Avatar for dicktater Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: