Fulton County Superior Court is holding the second day of its hearing on whether to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from prosecuting the Donald Trump election interference RICO case over allegations that she received an improper financial benefit via a relationship with an attorney she contracted to prosecute the case.
Follow along below.
Watch the hearing livestreamed from Judge McAfee's courtroom here.
Background:
- The current imbroglio began after defendant Mike Roman accused Willis of engaging in an improper personal relationship with the outside attorney that her office hired to prosecute the Trump case. Roman played his hand as hard as he could in the filing, accusing the prosecutor — Nathan Wade — of being unqualified to serve, and of reaping improper financial benefits from the case and from Willis.
- It's a sordid series of allegations aimed as much at tarnishing the prosecutors involved as at bringing the case away from its focus — accusations that Trump tried to steal the 2020 election in Georgia. Instead, we're now in an extended discussion of Willis' and Wade's personal lives.
- That being said, the pair admitted in a filing last week that they were romantically involved, but insisted that it only began after Wade was hired in November 2021 and that it does not mar the case. They stuck to that timeline in the first day of hearings on Thursday.
- Judge Scott McAfee said on Tuesday that he believes the allegations are serious enough to potentially disqualify Willis, though he excluded any discussion of whether Wade himself is qualified for the job from these hearings.
- Roman has continued to maintain that the relationship began long before Wade's hiring, and that it "tainted" the case, and his and Donald Trump's attorneys leveled hours of questions on Thursday about when the two prosecutors' relationship began.
More
Less
Fulton County Superior Court is holding the second day of its hearing on whether to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from prosecuting the Donald Trump election interference RICO case over allegations that she received an improper financial benefit via a relationship with an attorney she contracted to prosecute the case.
Follow along below.
Hopefully, today goes better and the focus remains on the true criminals within this case.
Here, Donnie, is your true witch hunt.
I hope she will be victorious here, but what comes next, I cannot imagine.
Judge McAfee offered cross-examination as a means for Willis to editorialize, after she kept decrying the accusations against her as “lies” while branding the attorneys themselves “liars.”
Didn’t Al Franken write a book about those people?
Fani isn’t wrong!
Kitty!
So, evidence.
None yesterday other than somewhat questionable witness saying relationship started earlier than W&W say. No financial evidence shown yet.
I am interested in one lawyers line of questioning about DC and White House visit.
Off to hike Bryce Canyon this morning, but hope by this evening to find out Willis has given resounding testimony today ((and not being overly pissed and belligerent on the stand) and read of a massive death-knell level disgorgement ruling against Trump in NY.