Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal Heads Toward A Do-Or-Die Moment

July 19, 2021
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 15: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) arrives for a press conference (Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
|
July 19, 2021

This week, the Senate is hurtling towards a determinative moment on the bipartisan infrastructure deal.

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) set up a vote to move the bill to debate for this Wednesday. Some Republican negotiators in the group groused about the move, saying they won’t vote to proceed to debate — a vote that precedes final passage — if the bill’s text is still not finished.

Schumer’s camp retorts that this is the timeline he’s been previewing all along, and that even if the bill needs more work, that shouldn’t keep members of the group from voting to at least debate the bill’s contents.

This drama could consume the first half of this week. But ultimately, this deal is lower stakes for Democrats than the sweeping $3.5 trillion budget package to be passed through reconciliation that they’re working on simultaneously. The bipartisan deal is much smaller and narrower.

While it would give Democrats and President Joe Biden a bipartisan legislative victory, Democrats have been pretty clear-eyed about the realities here: rustling up 10 Republicans to vote on pretty much anything Democrats want to do has always seemed remote. And if the bipartisan deal collapses, they can wrap some of those proposals into the reconciliation bundle — assuming that moderates allow a higher topline to encompass the “hard infrastructure” provisions.

More Less

This week, the Senate is hurtling towards a determinative moment on the bipartisan infrastructure deal.

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) set up a vote to move the bill to debate for this Wednesday. Some Republican negotiators in the group groused about the move, saying they won’t vote to proceed to debate — a vote that precedes final passage — if the bill’s text is still not finished.

Schumer’s camp retorts that this is the timeline he’s been previewing all along, and that even if the bill needs more work, that shouldn’t keep members of the group from voting to at least debate the bill’s contents.

This drama could consume the first half of this week. But ultimately, this deal is lower stakes for Democrats than the sweeping $3.5 trillion budget package to be passed through reconciliation that they’re working on simultaneously. The bipartisan deal is much smaller and narrower.

While it would give Democrats and President Joe Biden a bipartisan legislative victory, Democrats have been pretty clear-eyed about the realities here: rustling up 10 Republicans to vote on pretty much anything Democrats want to do has always seemed remote. And if the bipartisan deal collapses, they can wrap some of those proposals into the reconciliation bundle — assuming that moderates allow a higher topline to encompass the “hard infrastructure” provisions.

Notable Replies

  1. Democrats = Do
    Republicans = Die

  2. It looks as though this is the only way that “bipartisanship” could have gone down…and it’s going down.

  3. FUCK

    JOE

    MANCHIN

    Go drink bleach, discobot.

  4. This seems right to me as things stand with the GOPers now. It reminds me of a bus line in Mexico from my days there back in the '80s–it had such a horrible safety record that the running joke was that its motto was, “Better dead than late.”

  5. Outside of immigrants and some people (like the Military, some journalists, etc) who have been exposed to conditions abroad, too many people are blase about the GOP hurtling us toward Third World Status.

    There is breathtaking obliviousness of the opportunity at hand with a Biden presidency. It’s mostly on the Right, but not all of it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

132 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for sniffit Avatar for yskov Avatar for arrendis Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for darrtown Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for tsp Avatar for brian512 Avatar for katscherger Avatar for skeptical Avatar for jwbuho Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Akimbo Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: