Sens. McCain and Graham just finished meeting with President Obama about Syria and are talking to reporters outside the White House. Cutting through all the self-righteous crap, you’re left with the fact that, despite their deep dissatisfaction with Obama’s Syria policy up to now, a limited strike on Assad is better than nothing, so they’ll go along with it. Read More
So it appears there’s a totally over-the-top drug running crime family running Suriname. One of the weirdest stories I’ve seen in some time.
I’m just back from a ten day vacation and missed most of the Syria developments over that period. But in case you missed it, here’s my quick take from over the weekend on some key issues to keep in mind.
The day’s main event in the Syria debate was expected to be the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing featuring Chuck Hagel and John Kerry, which gets underway at 2:30 p.m. ET (you can watch live streaming coverage here). But the day’s most consequential development turned out to be the unexpected — and unexpectedly full-throated — support for Obama’s Syria mission from John Boehner and Eric Cantor, who this morning publicly urged their House GOP colleagues to back the plan, too. More on this development from Sahil Kapur.
As I signaled over the weekend, I’m not clear on the best way to proceed with the poor set of options we appear to have in Syria. I’m also of mixed mind on Obama’s decision to take the question to Congress. I think there is no question that the President does not need Congress’s approval to take the action he seems inclined to take. And I’m surprised how many people now seem to think or pretend otherwise. That said, it is often wise to seek such authorization. And what we’ve seen over the last three days shows some of the perversity that grows up when Congress is not involved in questions of war and peace. Read More
Chuck Hagel and John Kerry appeared before the Senate to try to clarify what happens next in Syria.
I’ve had a bunch of readers writing in this afternoon questioning – with more or less levels of engagement or outrage – my contention that the President does not require congressional authority to launch an attack on Syria. I’m not sure how regular a reader TPM Reader PM is since he refers to me as “Mr. Marshall” but here’s his take on the question.
Mr. Marshall writes:
I think there is no question that the President does not need Congress’s approval to take the action he seems inclined to take. And I’m surprised how many people now seem to think or pretend otherwise.