As long time readers know, every year TPM does an annual reader survey. We keep it brief. We don’t collect any personal information about individuals. And it’s very important that we get as big a sample as we can. We’re doing the survey this week. We’ll post it here in the editors’ blog when it’s ready. Yep, just to be clear. Don’t look in this post for a link. We haven’t published it yet. But we just wanted to give you a heads up that it’s coming. When we post it, please take a moment to fill it out. It only takes about five minutes and very important for TPM. We really appreciate it. Thanks.

Why on earth did the Democrat speaking for the Democrats just now on Hardball say it was “courageous” but “politically stupid” for Paul Ryan to put up a plan to abolish Medicare and other federal social programs? That’s the best he can do? “Courageous”? That’s simply amazing. If ordinary people who look forward to being able to rely on Medicare once they retire can’t even get advocates who don’t think it’s “courageous” to try to abolish Medicare, why are Democrats even in this game?

You can respect people’s contrary opinions. But presumably it’s wrong to abolish Medicare because it’s wrong. And that Dems are the party who believes it’s wrong.

It’s a separate matter that so many people are creating this cult about Paul Ryan that he’s some sort of visionary leader when he’s just putting forward policies that the right of the GOP has been advocating for decades. But really, even the Democrats think that this is “courageous”? I guess in a way it was courageous for the Delaware GOP to run Christine O’Donnell.

Has this guy even understood what the policy is? How courageous would it be to abolish Social Security. Sometimes things are politically risky because they’re profoundly bad ideas.

Simply amazing.

Speaker Boehner to distribute guidance to House members with protocols on what to do in event of government shutdown.

With negotiations still at a standoff, House Republicans are preparing a one-week stop gapping spending measure to keep the government open for a single week. But the price is roughly half a trillion dollars of program cuts on an annualized basis. So the aim is present Democrats and the White House with cuts they can’t accept and force them to be the ones who ‘shut down the government.’

This is being presented as a clever ploy. And perhaps it is. But if my memory serves me right this is actually pretty similar to the ploy they used in 1995 and which worked so well for them.

“Adult conversation” = Phasing out Medicare and replacing it with a system of vouchers to help seniors buy private health insurance.

Yesterday, I told you about the Dem strategist who went on Hardball and somehow managed to laud Rep. Ryan’s plan to abolish Medicare as “courageous” if also “political stupid”. Well, now we have the video of Dem strategist Steve McMahon. Check it out after the jump … Read More

Medicare is such a popular program and people are so against abolishing it that you have to really work hard to flub the debate and obscure what its enemies are trying to do to actually let it get abolished if you’re trying to save it. But congressional Democrats and the White House do seem to be giving it the old college try.

So here goes. What the Republicans are proposing are not cuts. Some level of cuts and/or cost containment in Medicare are necessary because medical inflation is growing so quickly. But these aren’t cuts. They’re using a temporary budget crisis and the need to slow the rate of Medicare costs over long run simply to abolish the program. That’s a bait and switch. It’s the medical side equivalent of the “private accounts” bamboozle that President Bush used in 2005 to try to phase out Social Security. Read More

Great shots from the epic 1995-96 government shutdown:

Sen. Baucus (D) says no abolishing Medicare as long as I’m Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

Seems like there are a few Dems actually identifying the Ryan Plan as abolishing Medicare.