Gonzales grins and takes it. From the Post …
Specter emerged from the meeting saying he still had no clear understanding why the prosecutors were dismissed. He said he instructed Gonzales to take back remarks he made in an op-ed in Wednesday’s USA Today, in which he called the issue an “overblown personnel matter.” Specter also asked Gonzales to do something to help remove the “significant blemish” now on the records of the fired prosecutors.
Krugman …
For those of us living in the Garden State, the growing scandal over the firing of federal prosecutors immediately brought to mind the subpoenas that Chris Christie, the former Bush âPioneerâ who is now the U.S. attorney for New Jersey, issued two months before the 2006 election â and the way news of the subpoenas was quickly leaked to local news media.
The subpoenas were issued in connection with allegations of corruption on the part of Senator Bob Menendez, a Democrat who seemed to be facing a close race at the time. Those allegations appeared, on their face, to be convoluted and unconvincing, and Mr. Menendez claimed that both the investigation and the leaks were politically motivated.
Mr. Christieâs actions might have been all aboveboard. But given what weâve learned about the pressure placed on federal prosecutors to pursue dubious investigations of Democrats, Mr. Menendezâs claims of persecution now seem quite plausible.
In fact, itâs becoming clear that the politicization of the Justice Department was a key component of the Bush administrationâs attempt to create a permanent Republican lock on power. Bear in mind that if Mr. Menendez had lost, the G.O.P. would still control the Senate.
This raises a key point we’ve hinted at several times as the US Attorney story has risen to a boil over the last three weeks. We’ve now heard enough to know that using federal prosecutions to score political points was an accepted way of doing business in the Gonzales Justice Department. The two cases we know about are ones in which the US Attorney refused to play along and paid the price. So what about the ones who did play along?
Given what we know now, does anyone think the Iglesias and McKay cases are the only ones?
As Krugman says, perhaps the Christie subpoenas were aboveboard. But they did they play directly into the campaign narrative Tom Kean, Jr. was trying to run on against Bob Menendez, they came at a very convenient time in a bitterly contested race and, as we reported at the time, the alleged infraction was patently silly.
Of course, to the best of my knowledge, Kean’s defeat seems to have sapped all the interest out of the investigation. So go figure.
We’re focused now on what happened to the US Attorneys who didn’t play ball. It’s time to focus on just what kinds of games Alberto Gonzales has been playing.
Today’s Must Read: a new inspector general report finds that the FBI is breaking the law.
The hits just keep on coming. A sixth newspaper has now dropped Ann Coulter’s syndicated column in the wake of her “faggot” comment.
Isn’t it a little odd that in all the uproar over Domenici, Wilson, and Hastings leaning on U.S. attorneys, there has not been one word about it from the Justice Department?
I don’t mean an investigation, though that may be warranted (criminal, internal, or otherwise). But not a peep about how DOJ will not tolerate elected officials attempting to influence its prosecutors, how DOJ has its prosecutors’ backs, how DOJ would remind prosecutors to report any such contacts, and would urge anyone who has not previously reported such contacts to come forward now.
Not a peep.
Seems strange to me. Bet you feel alone on an island if you’re an independent U.S. Attorney with a story to tell –if any independent U.S. Attorneys are left.
Get ready for the latest winger attack: John Edwards could become our “first woman President.”
This is getting good.
A seventh newspaper has now given the hook to Ann Coulter with some very tough language.
Did the administration intend to replace the fired U.S. attorneys wtih handpicked party loyalists and then avoid Senate confirmation?
Well, that’s what Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) said one of the former prosecutors told him.