Back in January, Dan Dzwilewski, the FBI’s special agent in charge of the San Diego field office, told the San Diego Union-Tribune that Carol Lam’s dismissal would jeopardize on-going corruption investigations and that “I guarantee politics is involved.”
After his quotes were published, the folks back in DC told him to keep quiet.
Today’s Must Read: senators grill the FBI chief over the firings of the U.S. attorneys.
Purge meister Kyle Sampson is lectured on the virtue of experience.
Goodling on the call when Domenici called Justice to complain about Iglesias going too soft on Democrats.
There’s your answer. White House personnel appear to have been systematically avoiding using their government emails on the job because they knew they might some day be subpoenaed.
But as we noted earlier with Karl Rove, this may have been too clever by half. If the president’s aides were using RNC emails or emails from other Republican political committees, they can’t have even the vaguest claim to shielding those communications behind executive privilege.
Whitewater sleuth Jeff Gerth is sniffing away at Hillary’s trail again.
Dobson gives the thumbs down to a Fred Thompson candidacy. “I don’t think he’s a Christian.”
In advance of tomorrow’s testimony by arch-Purgemeister and former Gonzales chief of staff Kyle Sampson, we’re trying to assemble all the relevant information 
together so you can best understand and interpret just what Sampson says and whether and how it comports with the facts as they are presently known.
One part of the story which is coming into focus pretty quickly is the position of Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and the coterie around Gonzales himself.
McNulty was the one who went up to the Hill and said the firings were for poor performance. But McNulty has since told Sen. Schumer that he explicitly asked Goodling and others, who were briefing him for his testimony, various questions about what had happened in the attorney firings and that they lied to him. ‘Misled’ him might be the term of art. But the key point from what McNulty is saying is that if he misled Congress it wasn’t intentionally. It was because Goodling et al. misled him. If true, that would be a crime. And that’s almost certainly the real reason Goodling will take the fifth when called to testify.
In any case, we’re going to have all this information laid out for you in time for the big event tomorrow. And with so much muck around, that reminds me that our DC Muckraking Fundraiser (for details click here) continues!
If you want to help us hire new DC reporter-bloggers to help rake all the muck that looks certain to pile up this year, click on the button below to make a contribution online or click here for instructions on contributing by mail.
You’ve never seen such a tongue-tied witness. Here’s a clip from this morning’s House hearing with GSA party-hack-in-chief Lurita Doan.