Stay the course. We never said ‘stay the course’. Our Iraq policy is stupid. No, sorry, I didn’t mean that. I don’t know what I was thinking. As we watch what, in the Star Trek universe, they might refer to as the ‘synaptic breakdown‘ of the president’s Iraq policy, it’s worth remembering why President Bush, short of being forced kicking and screaming, will never and can never withdraw American forces from Iraq.
Fundamentally, it doesn’t have to do with military strategy or ideology. It has to do with coming to grips with the monumental failure he has wrought, which of course he can never do.
Setting aside the vast costs in human life, national treasure and regional stability, I see President Bush’s adventure as a failed business venture, a start-up that went bad — an analogy that, come to think of it, he could probably relate to.
A failed company can lose money for a 
very long time before it makes money and becomes a success. It only really fails when the investors decide that the problems aren’t transient but terminal. They decide to stop throwing good money after bad. And then that’s it.
If we look at the matter in those icy terms, that moment of reckoning came at least two years ago, certainly before the 2004 election. By then it was depressingly clear the whole matter was never going to come to a good end. But President Bush got the country to reinvest and the country has kept on doing so since then with some factor of lives, money and time.
As long as that’s the case President Bush and his supporters can keep up the increasingly ludicrous pretense that Iraq isn’t a horrendous failure but simply a work in progress that hasn’t been given the necessary time to work.
In fact, I think if you look back over the last two years, President Bush has been engaged in what amounts to a cynical game of chicken with his fellow Americans.
Think of the president as a failed or deadbeat entrepreneur (again, not such a stretch) who’s already lost his investors a ton of money. He goes back to them and says, ‘Okay, fine. You think I’m a moron and a screw-up who lost you guys a ton of money. Fine. But do you really want to finally, totally, conclusively kiss that $300 billion goodbye. You wanna just totally call it quits? Admit it’s a total loss? What about giving me just another $10 billion and maybe somehow I’ll actually pull this off? Or, since that’s just not gonna happen, a mere $10 billion to put off for six months having to write the whole thing off as a loss, having to come to grips once and for all with the fact that all the money’s gone and the whole thing’s a bust?’
That’s really what this is about. And I think we all know it pretty much across the political spectrum. In this way, paradoxically, the very magnitude of the president’s failure has become his tacit ally. It’s just such a big thing to come to grips with. And reinvesting in the president’s folly, even after any hope of recouping the money is gone, carries the critical fringe benefit of sustaining our own collective and increasingly threadbare denial.
But President Bush’s interests are not the same as the country’s. He’s maxed out, in for 100%. If Iraq is a failure, a mistake, then the same words will be written right after his name in the history books. A country, though, can take missteps and mistakes, course corrections and dead ends, and move on. We’ve done it before and we’ll do it again.
But President Bush can’t and won’t withdraw from Iraq because when he does, under the current conditions, he’ll sign the epitaph, the historical death warrant for his presidency. Unlike in the past there are no family friends to pawn the failure off on and let them take the loss. It’s all his. So he’ll keep kicking the can down the road forever.
You’ve probably noticed that the GOP likes to proclaim that big things are at stake in this fall’s election.
Dem Senator Robert Menendez’s new ad offers a bold retort: Yes, big things are indeed at stake in this election, which is exactly why you should vote Democratic.
The House ethics committee investigation is plowing ahead with their investigation of the Mark Foley scandal. But there’s ample reason to wonder: why should we trust these guys, anyway?
Oh, TPM Reader TC, having fun at the president’s expense …
Isn’t it interesting that now, just before the elections, Bush is choosing to cut and run from his pat phrase “stay the course?”
Bad TC, bad TC …
Stephen Moore’s Free Enterprise Fund: Don’t Vote for Goombah Bob Menendez.
President Bush has screwed up so much already that I understand it’s sometimes a bit difficult to devote attention to what new things he might screw up in the next two years, especially if his party still controls both houses of Congress. But remember: He’s put us on notice that he wants to try again to phase out Social Security next year.
He said so just today …
And did I mention Peter Roskam in Illinois 6 still supports the Bush Social Security phase out plan? I didn’t? Well, we’ll get to that.
Rep. Pombo (R-CA) so confident of reelection that he’s refusing to give any press interviews.
Here’s Denny Hastert’s Chief of Staff Scott Palmer emerging from almost six and a half hours of testimony before the House Ethics Committee today. That’s longer than any other witness who’s thus far made the basement pilgrimage in the Foley scandal. And it makes sense, since Palmer seems to be the vortex of the leadership fibbing.
Somhow he doesn’t look as happy as the other guys did.
Go figure.