9:33 PM: Okay, first break. I’m finding this debate more refreshing, engaging than I’d expected. I’ve expressed my frustration about the number of candidates allowed into these debates. I still feel that. But this seems like a debate that is engaging questions that most Americans are actually thinking about. Not all certainly: a big chunk of the country is obsessed with anti-immigrant policies, Iran, etc. But it’s better than I expected.
9:27 PM: I’m not sure what Booker is actually saying here in policy terms about Medicare for All or private insurance.
9:23 PM: O’Rourke feels like a throwback to a different era. I don’t mean that in the sense of being on one side or another of the health insurance policy question. I just mean tonally. Seems like a different era.
9:20 PM: That’s actually news. Only De Blasio and Warren said they were for Medicare for All, i.e., a single payer plan which would eliminate all but supplemental private insurance.
9:14 PM: I don’t know why de Blasio is running. But that was a great answer.
9:10 PM: Warren’s second bite at the economy apple, the response to Booker, was much better, the kind of clarity she’ll need as nominee.
9:09 PM: I think Booker’s answer on the economy is clearer, better than Warren’s.
9:04 PM: This is a bad format. Everyone’s rusty. But it’s too rushed.
9:02 PM: I do this for a living and I’m not totally sure who the guy over on the right is.
9:01 PM: Placeholder commentary.
- -Hiring More Journalists
- -Providing free memberships to those who cannot afford them
- -Supporting independent, non-corporate journalism