GOP Debate Sum Up

On balance, I think this debate went about as we’d expected. Donald Trump dominated the debate. Even when he wasn’t talking. Fox took it upon itself to go after him hard. But mainly they didn’t land a punch. With one key exception (when and how he became a Republican), Trump managed to parry pretty much all the questions sent his way, despite most answers totally lacking any substance, lacking any logical coherence, or in most cases not even addressing the questions. Perhaps I’ll be wrong. But I don’t think his refusal to pledge not to run as an independent will hurt him. He didn’t equivocate. He just said it. More than anything, he knows his audience.

I expect the GOP primary campaign will continue on its current trajectory. Trump certainly didn’t have a break-out moment. But I don’t think his momentum will be damaged at all.

As interesting to me though was the light in which it cast the other candidates.

Jeb Bush struck me as weak. Rubio, arguably one of the GOP’s most promising candidates, was all but invisible. Kasich was far and away the most reasonable and fact-based. And he was the only person who seemed interested in governing. In context, a poor showing. The one candidate who I think came off well was Scott Walker, though he didn’t get that much time. He didn’t get pulled into Trump’s nonsense or fighting with other candidates. He made his basic case, which in Republican terms is a strong one: I won three times; I implemented an ideological right wing agenda; I brutalized the unions.

All the rest were good or bad but in electoral terms I think basically irrelevant: Christie, Paul, Carson, and whoever else. Oh yeah, Ted Cruz. Trump coming into this race really, really hurt him by supplanting him as the guy who would take everything just a step further than anyone else.

It was bloody. And Trump’s not going anywhere.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Edblog
  • |
    August 11, 2022 4:22 p.m.

    Federal judge orders DOJ to confer with Trump lawyers and report to him by 3 PM tomorrow about how to…

  • |
    August 11, 2022 3:41 p.m.

    A new episode of The Josh Marshall Podcast is live! This week, Josh and Kate discuss stunning developments in Kansas…

  • |
    August 11, 2022 3:15 p.m.

    Two significant takeaways from Garland’s presser. Garland personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant and carry out the…

  • |
    August 11, 2022 2:20 p.m.

    We’re awaiting a statement from AG Merrick Garland currently scheduled for 2:30 PM eastern. Presumably this is about the incident…

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: