Ed.Note on R2K

|
June 29, 2010 11:56 a.m.

As you’ve seen we’re reported on Markos’s charges that at least some of the data provided by Research 2000 was fraudulent and the statistical analysis on which the charges are based. I’ve read Nate Silver’s approving review of the statistical analysis. And I’ve spoken with Professor Charles Franklin, who is our outside consultant on polling questions.

Based on this review I’ve decided that there is more than enough question hanging over R2K’s data to warrant our purging the firm’s numbers from the TPMPolltracker database. That has now been done.

I should add that this is not and we’re not in a position to pronounce a verdict of guilty on R2K’s data. But that’s not the standard. We can only include data the integrity of which is beyond reasonable question. And on that basis we’ve removed it.

Should subsequent developments remove the cloud of suspicion over R2K’s data we would, of course, re-add it to our database.

Introducing
The TPM Journalism Fund: A New Way To Support TPM
We're launching the TPM Journalism Fund as an additional way for readers and members to support TPM. Every dollar contributed goes toward:
  • -Hiring More Journalists
  • -Providing free memberships to those who cannot afford them
  • -Supporting independent, non-corporate journalism
Are you experiencing financial hardship?
Apply for a free community-supported membership
advertisement
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer:
SPECIAL DEAL FOR PAST TPM MEMBERS
40% OFF AN ANNUAL PRIME MEMBERSHIP
REJOIN FOR JUST $30