Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
The Brief
Trump Cooks Up New Conspiracy Theories About the Butler Assassination Attempt
09.16.26 | 8:11 am
News
The Epstein Reckoning Hits the Midterm Campaign Trail
09.16.26 | 8:00 am
Where Things Stand
Patel Won’t Rule Out FBI Agents At the Polls Because … He Got Tired of Dems Asking About It?
09.15.26 | 5:27 pm
News
GOP Mad at Candidate For Doing Xenophobia The Wrong Way
09.15.26 | 4:27 pm