Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Where Things Stand
If Fetterman Were Going to Change Parties, He Might Act Like He’s Acting Now
07.16.26 | 4:11 pm
News
Can the New Progressive Wave That’s Reshaping the Democratic Party Win in a Rural Red State?
07.16.26 | 2:34 pm
The Franchise
Get Ready for a Conspiracy Theory-Laced Speech From Trump Tonight
07.16.26 | 2:00 pm
News
Georgia GOP Silent Amid Revelations About Senate Nominee’s White Nationalist Son-in-Law
07.16.26 | 1:55 pm