Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
The Franchise
The Franchise: Trump’s (Election) Lie-Laden State of the Union
02.26.26 | 1:59 pm
Morning Memo
Showdown Over Interim US Attorneys Brewing In Seattle
02.26.26 | 8:13 am
Where Things Stand
Johnson Says He Will Let Gonzales Allegations ‘Play Out’
02.25.26 | 5:00 pm
News
Cassidy Asks Trump’s MAHA Surgeon General Nom to Say Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism. She Wouldn’t
02.25.26 | 1:03 pm