Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
The Weekender
Texas Gets a Pass for a Gerrymandering Free-For-All. Will California Be Given the Same?
12.06.25 | 8:18 am
News
Supreme Court Will Hear Birthright Citizenship Case, for Real This Time
12.05.25 | 2:56 pm
News
Indiana House Approves Gerrymandered Map. Now It’ll Go to Senate After Trump Threats
12.05.25 | 1:59 pm
Cafe
3 States Are Challenging Precedent Against Posting the Ten Commandments in Public Schools
12.05.25 | 12:00 pm