Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Another Escalation in Trump’s War on Blue States
01.22.26 | 6:15 pm
News
How ‘Bitcoin Jesus’ Avoided Prison, Thanks to One of the ‘Friends of Trump’
01.22.26 | 12:34 pm
Morning Memo
Secret Internal Memo Exposes the Scale of ICE’s Lawlessness
01.22.26 | 11:11 am
News
What Does It Mean That SCOTUS Hasn’t Ruled on IEEPA Tariffs? Nothing, Experts Said.
01.22.26 | 11:02 am