Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Gabbard Distances Herself From Her Own Testimony About Iran
03.18.26 | 5:56 pm
Morning Memo
Judge Eviscerates Trump DOJ Over US Attorney Fiasco
03.18.26 | 10:21 am
News
Markwayne’s World: The ‘Cinematic’ And ‘Fantastical’ Life Of Trump’s DHS Pick
03.17.26 | 6:36 pm
Where Things Stand
Trump Chalks Up Joe Kent Resignation to a Brain Smarts Issue
03.17.26 | 6:21 pm