Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Morning Memo
Report: Joint Federal and State Probe Into Pretti Shooting to be Announced
02.06.26 | 10:28 am
News
Epstein Tracked #MeToo Fallout and Advised Accused Men Behind the Scenes
02.06.26 | 8:57 am
News
Trump’s DOJ Keeps Losing in Court Over Bids to Eliminate Gender-Affirming Care
02.06.26 | 7:00 am
Where Things Stand
Slotkin Hits Back as Trump DOJ Pushes for Retribution
02.05.26 | 6:17 pm