Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Louisiana Governor Heckled, Rejected During Tour of GreenlandĀ
05.20.26 | 6:09 pm
Morning Memo
What Will Drop Next in the Corrupt Trump-IRS Deal?
05.20.26 | 9:04 am
News
Election Denialists Claim They Are Laying the Groundwork for a DOJ Probe of Michigan
05.20.26 | 9:00 am
News
An Ultra-MAGA Rep. and a Kemp-Backed Football Coach Fight to Face Ossoff
05.19.26 | 11:16 pm