Kate goes deeper on the new definition of “eve” the Court promulgated to help Republicans hold the House next year. (I don’t think it’ll be enough, but that’s another matter.) They take a principle that has some logic in extreme cases: there needs to be some balance between the merits of a case and potential disruption to an election. But given that we have House elections every two years, one year out cannot be the “eve” of an election. In any case, it’s more evidence of what we already know: we’re dealing with a corrupt Court at war with the Constitution. They do what they need to do to get the result they want. Read Kate.
LATEST
Morning Memo
Declaring Victory and Walking Away Can’t Conceal the Scale of Trump’s Folly
04.08.26 | 10:13 am
Cafe
Trump Wants to Build Massive New Detention Centers. States Are Blocking Their Construction.
04.08.26 | 8:00 am
News
Dem-Backed Judge Wins Wisconsin Supreme Court Seat, Expanding Its Liberal Majority
04.07.26 | 9:46 pm
Where Things Stand
This Is What We Were Talking About, Say Dems Who Trump Threatened to Hang
04.07.26 | 5:45 pm