Since we spoke last the two Georgia Senators have endorsed $2,000 checks. Senate Democrats called for a vote and Mitch McConnell refused to allow a vote.
There it is. McConnell blocks motion to vote on Democrats' $2,000 relief checks bill. pic.twitter.com/iYceWbNxiU
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 29, 2020
I heard a very knowledgable hill reporter say that McConnell doesn’t care how unpopular this is in the country. He only cares about the majority and saving those two Senate Republicans. This doesn’t add up to me. I’ll say first that I don’t think these races will come down to stimulus checks. But the races are close enough that it could come down to anything and everything.
JoinThere’s a surreal confluence of events right now with President Trump’s push for $2,000 checks. In his effort to remain relevant, lash out and fuel the fantasy the election is still underway, President Trump glommed on to the Democrats’ proposal for $2,000 relief checks. Now it may end up both making $2,000 checks a reality and upending the Republicans in the Senate runoffs. It could be both, neither, a mix. But he’s now created a situation in which McConnell will really cut Loeffler and Perdue off at the knees if he doesn’t allow this vote to happen. They both say they support it. If McConnell, the guy who’s control of the senate is their election raison d’etre, opposes it where does that leave them? They’re both now endorsing it after consistently opposing it. And the Democrat Ossoff is the one who’s pushed them.
In twenty years of doing this, one thing that strikes me again and again is the critical importance of naming things in politics. If the question is advocacy and persuasion few steps are more important than effectively and consistently naming the key developments, agenda items, threats and prizes and raising them in the public consciousness. There are few things – things that can be controlled by people involved in politics and campaigns, as opposed to the tides of historical change we are awash in – more important for Democrats to do a good job at in the next two yeas.
You know some examples of this. The ‘death tax’, for instance. Conservative operatives took the unglamorous and unsympathetic cause of trust fund kids and gave it a title with punch, ready understandability and even an edge of justice. In politics like everything else you simply must put your best foot forward. Just showing up or just doing a good job is never enough. You have to tell your story. You have to make sure people with a lot else on their plate know what you’re doing, why you’re doing it and why it might be important to them that you succeed. That starts with naming things. That makes the thing visible and tells a story about it embedded in the name.
At the risk of stating the obvious, President Trump threatened and bullied over refusing to sign the COVID relief bill. In the end, he got nothing and signed it anyway. His statement included a slew of claims about how he made an important point and everyone got the message about how right he was. But in the end he folded. Because he always folds. It’s one of the most enduring patterns of his presidency. If he can’t get his way through threats, he folds.
One of the pleasures for me of this 20th anniversary package, as I’ve mentioned, is reading each installment fresh. I was interviewed for a few of these pieces and answered some questions. But I didn’t write them or have any role in the process other than that. It’s good to have a second set of eyes. And there are parts I’m learning about for the first time. The latest installment from Tierney Sneed looks at how our coverage of Obamacare helped shape the niche TPM’s DC office would carve out in the capital news ecosystem and within TPM. The legislative, implementation and political history of Obamacare is certainly one of the two or three stories we’ve invested most time and resources in going back 20 years. As Tierney explains, the long story of Obamacare played to two critical TPM strengths: a basic seriousness about and knowledge of the policy detail which is often just a background story in political journalism and an attention to the subterranean political world that often, cryptically, drives formal or official political narratives.
Both those strengths allowed our evolving team to see developments and land exclusives that others missed on this critical, consequential story.
To all who celebrate, either as a Christian holiday or a secular celebration, Merry Christmas! I want to thank all of our members and readers who have been with us through this arduous year, supporting our work, reading our work, continuing to make this enterprise possible. Thank you. And have a wonderful, nurturing and revivifying day.
Yesterday, as the news set in that President Trump had pardoned almost everyone involved in the Russia scandal, I saw an editor at one of the big political publications say that with this step President Trump had taken one more step in erasing the Mueller probe. This is wrong. And explaining why it’s wrong gives me another opportunity to reaffirm my belief that knowledge, a public accounting of what happened is far more important than punishment for individual wrongdoers.
In addition to pardons for Jared Kushner’s father and Roger Stone, President Trump this evening issued a full pardon for Paul Manafort.
This is the ultimate measure of the COVID pandemic in the United States: at least 400,000 more Americans died in 2020 than died in 2019. The total is about 3.2 million, the first time it’s ever been more than 3 million. Not all of those deaths were due to COVID infections. The official COVID death toll is currently around 320,000. But virtually all are due to the pandemic – both COVID infections and collateral impact, which can range from acute stress (grief, economic dislocation) to degraded quality of medical care and myriad impacts of everything that has happened this last year.
If we transport ourselves back to those first weeks in January and February, when COVID was a thing happening in China that over time seemed more and more likely to end up in the US, this is what we could have known: that the impact would mean more than 400,000 people in the US would end up dying who wouldn’t otherwise have died in 2020.
Quarantine has forced some of us to spend quite a lot of time in isolation with some … unique characters to say the least.
But President Trump — who, unlike the rest of us, has spent little time actually quarantining since COVID-19 first hit the U.S. — is actively choosing to keep the company of out-there characters.
Join