White House: GOP Shutdown Threat Is All About Protecting ‘Big Polluters’

U.S. President Barack Obama on stage during the plenary session at the climate summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, Friday, Dec. 18, 2009. President Obama says that the world's will to address climate change "hangs in the ... U.S. President Barack Obama on stage during the plenary session at the climate summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, Friday, Dec. 18, 2009. President Obama says that the world's will to address climate change "hangs in the balance" and insists any deal must include transparency among nations. (AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The White House fired a warning shot to Republican senators on Wednesday after several of them expressed interest in using a must-pass government funding bill to block the Obama administration’s environmental regulations.

“If Republicans want to repeat their government shutdown play to protect the profits of big polluters, they’re placing a pretty risky bet,” a White House official, who wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter on the record, told TPM.

TPM reported that numerous House and Senate Republicans have expressed interest in using appropriations legislation to prohibit implementation of the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulations on coal-fired power plants. If they demand that as a condition for keeping the federal government running once funding expires on Sept. 30, it could lead to another partial shutdown.

Senate Republican Conference Chair John Thune (R-SD) said Tuesday there’s “going to be a lot of support” among Republicans for using the appropriations process to block the EPA rules. He said the GOP will do “anything we can do to prevent the administration from going forward with what are really poorly timed, very burdensome, very expensive … regulations.”

Numerous other GOP senators championed the strategy.

On Wednesday, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), a senior member of the environment committee and leading denier of man-made climate change, said he supports using government funding legislation as a vehicle to reverse the EPA rules.

“I would do anything to block it, including that,” Inhofe told TPM. “[The regulations] would constitute the largest tax increase in the history of America on the American people and accomplish nothing for it.”

The White House is strongly committed to the EPA regulations on coal, the most recent of which aims to slash climate-warming emissions by 30 percent by 2030. Obama sees climate change action as a cornerstone of his presidential legacy. The rules have become an animating force against the president for lawmakers in fossil fuel states, most notably Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who is facing a strong Democratic challenger in his reelection bid.

It remains to be seen if Republicans will follow through with the strategy at the risk of a partial government shutdown just one month before the congressional elections. If they want to force the issue, House Republicans could pass a government funding bill that reverses the EPA rules. Senate Republicans could make life difficult for Democrats by filibustering funding legislation that doesn’t undo the regulations. Eventually it’ll be up to GOP leaders in the House and Senate to decide whether — and how strongly — to pick the fight.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Don’t listen to that anonymous Obama official, GOP. Do what you think is best; shutdown the government. Worked so well the last time.

  2. The United States does not negotiate with terrorists - foreign or domestic.

  3. [Thune] said the GOP will do "anything we can do to prevent the administration from going forward with what are really poorly timed, very burdensome, very expensive ... regulations anything whatsoever."

    Fixed.

  4. Except when we do, like with the Vietcong, the Iranians, the creation/funding of Bin Laden… etc etc etc.
    Absolutes are for those who don’t deal with reality.

  5. TPM: “If Republicans want to repeat their government shutdown play to protect the profits of big polluters, they’re placing a pretty risky bet,” a White House official, who wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter on the record, told TPM.

    Heh. Warn the GOP not to do something, and they’re bound to do it. This is leading them right into the trap.

    Of course, Republicans, could be the White House is just bluffing. Guess there’s only one way to find out. Do you feel lucky?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

9 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for webcelt Avatar for maxie Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for rudesan Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for irasdad Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for progressiveinnewyork Avatar for kickbass Avatar for cali_man Avatar for terryann Avatar for dballance

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: