White House Strongly Denies Reports Obama Has Decided On Afghanistan Troop Levels

November 9, 2009 4:45 p.m.

The White House is forcefully denying reports that President Obama has settled on the number of troops to send to Afghanistan.

Several stories in recent days have suggested he has made a decision and cite specific troop levels.

Officials have dismissed those as inaccurate, but tonight the White House is sending out a rare statement from National Security Adviser Gen. Jim Jones:

“Reports that President Obama has made a decision about Afghanistan are absolutely false. He has not received final options for his consideration, he has not reviewed those options with his national security team, and he has not made any decisions about resources. Any reports to the contrary are completely untrue and come from uninformed sources.”

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters today the president is holding another Situation Room meeting of his war council as he continues to gather information for his decision.The Wednesday session in the Situation Room is the eighth such meeting and comes right before Obama travels on Thursday for a more than week-long trip to Asia. Gibbs said he does not expect the president to make the decision – or the announcement – before he leaves.

Gibbs also had some snark for reporters asking about the troops decision:

Q Robert, as far as you know, has the President decided on number of troops, additional troops he’d like to send to Afghanistan?

MR. GIBBS: No, no. Despite the many chances to read otherwise throughout the weekend. Safe to say if he’d made a decision, I think we could free up at least part of his Wednesday.

Late update: Today on air Force One, Gibbs was even more irritated with reporters. Here’s one exchange:

Q The stories about Afghan troop numbers — does the President find it troubling that this kind of information, even if it’s not final, is leaking out? Does it bother him, and does it make him concerned? And is he done with his decision?

MR. GIBBS: I think you may have summed up my answer in your question. I will say this — I will tell you what General Jones said and I think we said to a few of you last night: The President will have an opportunity to discuss four options with his national security team tomorrow. Anybody that tells you that the President has made a decision or — what was the artfully used term last night, “tentatively agreed to” — doesn’t have, in all honesty, the slightest idea what they’re talking about. The President has yet to make a decision.

I would counsel you all to — I got asked on Saturday about a story of approving 34,000 troops, only to be asked yesterday about a story of approving nearly 40,000 troops — this all two weeks after being asked about whether or not we were coalescing around an entirely different option. I don’t know that it’s annoying as much as it is generally amusing to watch somebody or some group of people decide they know what only the President knows. You know, it keeps me busy and it’s in some ways fun to watch two reports that contradict each other be reported virtually simultaneously.

Q Does it bother him, though? Does it bother him?

MR. GIBBS: He hasn’t let me know that.

Q — presented him with the four options — is that the four options by General McChrystal or –

MR. GIBBS: The four options that his national security team, including the Pentagon and General McChrystal, that the President will discuss with the team tomorrow.

Q Can you describe those just real briefly, or —

MR. GIBBS: (Laughter.) See my previous answer. And please note that the transcript should include me laughing. No, I’m not getting — I appreciate the opportunity to get into —

Q Wanted to give you every opportunity.

MR. GIBBS: You know, and I — Bloomberg is always fair like that.

Q Well, just to follow up on that, in all seriousness, from your perspective, so you want us to know that he’s considering four options, but don’t want us to know what they are? What’s the White House —

MR. GIBBS: With all due respect, you guys reported last night with some degree of certainty that the decision had already been made. Am I sensing from your follow-up question that you don’t think the story that you wrote last night on the AP wire was accurate?

Q I have every reason to think it is. I’m trying to —

MR. GIBBS: Maybe we should ask you questions. (Laughter.)

Q I’m trying to figure out what the White House thinking is about saying there’s four options —

MR. GIBBS: — I said yesterday, I’ll say what I said last night after, with some certainty, AP and CBS reported a decision had been made, and I’ll tell it to you now: The President hasn’t made a decision. Now, I don’t expect that will change the AP wire; it didn’t this morning.

Q I understand your point. I’m trying to move on, which is why —

MR. GIBBS: I am —

Q I have no personal animus with you –

MR. GIBBS: I don’t either. You have to understand my somewhat — my surprise that you’d ask a follow-up based on what you reported.

Q I’m following up on your specific point of telling us tomorrow in this council meeting they’ll discuss four options. I’m asking, why are you telling us that fact and not others?

MR. GIBBS: Because, honestly, Ben, we’ve been — I think we’ve been very transparent throughout this process. We’ve let you all know when these meetings are; we’ve let you know who’s in these meetings; we’ve put out pictures of these meetings. The President is doing this in a very purposeful and deliberate way to get the best decision. And I promise you that when he makes that decision we’ll let you know. And as I’ve said before, the President will take the time to explain that decision and its reasoning to the American people.

Q That’s still weeks away? You would still say weeks? Weeks or —

Q Any more decision about how he would do that?

MR. GIBBS: No, not yet.

The TPM Journalism Fund: A New Way To Support TPM
We're launching the TPM Journalism Fund as an additional way for readers and members to support TPM. Every dollar contributed goes toward:
  • -Hiring More Journalists
  • -Providing free memberships to those who cannot afford them
  • -Supporting independent, non-corporate journalism
Are you experiencing financial hardship?
Apply for a free community-supported membership
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer: