The 2020 U.S. Census will determine which states gain or lose electoral power for years to come, and President Donald Trump is leaning towards appointing a pro-gerrymandering professor with no government experience to help lead the effort.
Politico reported Tuesday that Trump may soon tap Thomas Brunell, a political science professor at the University of Texas at Dallas who has no background in statistics, for a powerful deputy position that doesn’t require congressional approval.
He authored a 2008 book titled Competitive Elections are Bad for America.
The position has historically been held by a career civil servant who has served many years in the Census Bureau.
Brunell has made his career advocating for gerrymandering—the practice of drawing electoral districts to make them easier for one political party to maintain a grip on power. In his book and in testimony before Congress on several occasions, Brunell has argued that maps that pack voters of one party into a single district, thereby diluting their overall power, should be considered “fair.” He has also worked on behalf of a number of Republican-controlled states that have been sued for racial and partisan gerrymandering, including Ohio and North Carolina.
Civil and voting rights advocates have been sounding the alarm since the beginning of this year about the fate of the 2020 Census, and the bureau currently has no director and faces a severe budget shortfall.
Now, there are fears that the appointment of an ideological conservative could lead to changes in the Census that could have repercussions for many years to come. For example, conservatives have long argued for adding a question about citizenship status to the Census, which may scare immigrants away from responding and being counted. As deputy director, Brunell would also have power over the ad budget used to encourage people to participate in the Census, and could potentially steer those resources in a way that favors conservative strongholds.
“Americans expect and deserve a fair and accurate Census that is free from the political partisanship Brunell would bring to the process,” Karen Hobert Flynn, the president of the government watchdog group Common Cause, said in a statement Tuesday.
The group is one of several opposing Brunell’s appointment.
Take any given scenario that calls for a political appointment to fill. Find the worst person you could possibly imagine to fill that post. Trump will pick someone even worse.
I’m shocked I tell you! Just shocked that trump is a dirty low down pond scum sucking carnival barking kindergarten tweeting mob boss wannabe chicken fucking crook.
Okay, I’m just sure about the chicken fucking part, but some people are talking about it.
Okay, you were more eloquent than I was. I’m not doing eloquent today though–nor can I spell it without spell check telling me that I’m WRONG and it doesn’t have a ‘g’ in it.
This is precisely the kind of thing that a competent opposition party would immediately and loudly and vociferously start communicating to the public and the media about, because this can potentially drive a stake into the efforts of the Democratic Party to regain some of the legislative seats it’s lost since 2008.
Which means that they’ll start talking about it in December of 2019.
Let’s consider why he wants to always be regarded as illegitimate by a sizeable segment of the populace, that his party only can gain and hold power by cheating, gerrymandering, disenfranchising voters.