Trump Admin Confirms They’ll Blow Court Deadline For Returning Immigrant Children

CHICAGO, June 30, 2018 -- People participate in the "Families Belong Together" rally at Daley Plaza in Chicago, the United States, on June 30, 2018. Tens of thousands of Americans marched and rallied across the United States to protest the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" immigration policy resulting in over 2,000 children separated from their families who crossed the border illegally. (Xinhua/Wang Ping)
CHICAGO, June 30, 2018 -- People participate in the "Families Belong Together" rally at Daley Plaza in Chicago, the United States, on June 30, 2018. Tens of thousands of Americans marched and rallied across the Unite... CHICAGO, June 30, 2018 -- People participate in the "Families Belong Together" rally at Daley Plaza in Chicago, the United States, on June 30, 2018. Tens of thousands of Americans marched and rallied across the United States to protest the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" immigration policy resulting in over 2,000 children separated from their families who crossed the border illegally. (Xinhua/Wang Ping) (Xinhua/Wang Ping via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Trump administration returns to federal court Monday morning to plead for more time to reunite about 100 children younger than five years old who were taken from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The American Civil Liberties Union confirmed Sunday night that the government will blow past the Tuesday deadline imposed by District Judge Dana Sabraw for the Southern District of California, telling reporters that it “appears likely that less than half will be reunited.”

“It’s extremely disappointing that the Trump administration looks like it will fail to reunite even half the children under five with their parents,” said Lee Gelernt, the ACLU’s lead attorney in the class action lawsuit on the immigrant family separations. “These kids have already suffered so much because of this policy, and every extra day apart just adds to that pain.”

On Friday, Judge Sabraw held off on granting the Trump administration a deadline extension, and instead ordered them to give the ACLU a list of the 102 immigrant children under five in their custody and the status of their attempts to reunite those children with their parents. In that same hearing, Sabraw rejected arguments from the Justice Department that they should not be obligated to reunite the young children with 19 parents who had already been deported back to their home countries. He then ordered the parties to appear back in court Monday morning after Trump administration attorney Sarah Fabian said she had “dog-sitting responsibilities” that would prevent her from meeting over the weekend.

The ACLU says the Trump administration gave them an incomplete list of the children by the Saturday deadline Sabraw set, and provided the rest of the information they sought on Sunday.

The government’s claims that they have lost track of dozens of immigrant parents of children under five bodes poorly for their ability to meet the court’s second deadline. Under Sabraw’s national injunction, the Trump administration must reunite all of the roughly 3,000 immigrant families they have separated two weeks from Tuesday.

Latest DC
29
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. He then ordered the parties to appear back in court Monday morning after Trump administration attorney Sarah Fabian said she had “dog-sitting responsibilities” that would prevent her from meeting over the weekend.

    You can’t make this stuff up.

  2. C’mon Judge Sabraw. Start putting people in jail. Start with the dog-sitter and the Wicked Witch of the DHS.
    Televising the hearing would be nice.

  3. Avatar for leeks leeks says:

    This is an example of the work of Little Donnie’s very best. The swamp is now overflowing.

  4. These heinous US attorneys probably huddled and asked each other what the hell the judge can do about it if they just say it’s impossible to comply with the judge’s order. I’m no lawyer, but I’m sure interested in learning exactly what the judge “can do” about this huge middle finger the Trump a-hole attorneys are giving to the court.

  5. All this from the “pro-life” party and administration??

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for marby Avatar for pac Avatar for clemmers Avatar for cervantes Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leeks Avatar for xpat4321 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for benthere Avatar for tena Avatar for georgemilquetoast Avatar for tsp Avatar for patl Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for katscherger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: