The Wheels Are Coming Off The Tax Bill’s Promised Deficit Trigger

FILE-In this Oct. 25, 2017 file photo, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., talks to reporters as he returns to his office from a vote, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Taking on a crowd of ... FILE-In this Oct. 25, 2017 file photo, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., talks to reporters as he returns to his office from a vote, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Taking on a crowd of jeering union workers, standing up to a charismatic Democratic opponent on his home turf or lecturing upper management of one of the world's largest corporations, Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker has rarely backed down from a fight. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) MORE LESS

The Republican tax bill sailed out of committee Tuesday after former hold-out Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) secured a “verbal promise” from President Trump to include a “trigger” mechanism in the bill that would undo some of the bill’s tax cuts if they—as predicted—balloon the federal deficit in the coming years.

But the wheels are already coming off the car.

Uncertainty about exactly what tax cuts would fall under the trigger and the length of time before it goes into effect, along with staunch opposition to the idea from fellow Republicans and outside conservative groups, could kill the idea before it ever makes it into the bill. With a vote just a day away and the details of the proposal still shrouded in secrecy, senators are agonizing over siding with the deficit hawks demanding the trigger or the growing band of lawmakers insisting no trigger is necessary because the tax cuts will create wild economic growth to fill the trillion-plus dollar deficit.

According to information leaked to Bloomberg News, one version of the trigger currently under discussion involves $350 billion in tax hikes beginning in 2022 if the promised growth fails to materialize. The exact size of the tax increase would be determined by the size of the economic shortfall. Another version detailed by Politico involved hiking the corporate tax rate by 1 percent if GDP doesn’t grow an average of 0.4 percent over the five years after the law is enacted.

A final version may never see the light of day.

At least four senators – Dean Heller (R-NV), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and John Kennedy (R-LA) – say they’re opposed to the idea of a deficit trigger. Grassley told TPM on Tuesday that it would inject uncertainty into the economy. On the House side, several lawmakers have also come out against the idea, and powerful conservative advocacy groups are mobilizing as well.

“The idea of a ‘tax hike trigger’ should be rejected on its merits,” wrote Club for Growth President David McIntosh on Wednesday. “It will have harmful impacts on American businesses and undermine any economic growth potential in this tax reform bill because businesses will not invest due to the possibility of a higher tax rate.”

Instead of a trigger that raises taxes if the federal deficit becomes too deep, the Koch brothers-funded group has an alternative proposal.

“Here’s an idea. How about cutting spending?” McIntosh wrote. “A spending cut trigger would be a far better idea.”

Americans for Prosperity joined the chorus, writing: “Champions of pro-growth, comprehensive tax reform should oppose any attempt to include this harmful provision.”

Neither group addressed the question of why, if they are so convinced the tax cuts would create plenty of economic growth and wouldn’t grow the deficit, they oppose a backstop measure that would only kick in in the event that fails to happen.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: