Texas Advocates Appeal To Supreme Court To Block Voter ID Law

A group of Texas advocates and elected officials challenging the state’s voter identification law filed a motion on Wednesday urging the Supreme Court to swiftly block the measure.

The emergency application came within one day of a decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to provisionally unblock the photo ID law after a federal district court judge ruled it unconstitutional last week.

“It is deeply troubling that the court of appeals would allow an unconstitutionally discriminatory voter ID law to deny the right to vote to hundreds of thousands of African-American and Hispanic voters,” J. Gerald Hebert, a lawyer for the challengers, said in a statement, “so as not to inconvenience Texas election officials by informing them they could no longer demand photo ID which the lower court condemned as a ‘poll tax.'”

The immediate question is whether the voter ID law will be in effect during the 2014 midterm elections. Only the Supreme Court can prevent that from happening now.

The larger question of whether the law runs afoul of the Constitution or Voting Rights Act will take time to proceed. It will next be heard on the merits at the 5th Circuit, a conservative-leaning court. After that it could land up in the Supreme Court if the losing side appeals.

In a brief interview with TPM, Heberg declined to speculate on whether his clients would appeal to the Supreme Court if the 5th Circuit ruled against them on the merits.

“I’m optimistic that the district court judge’s decision, which is thorough and accurate, will ultimately be upheld,” he said.

The lawsuit is being led by Rep. Marc Veasey, a Democrat who represents the Fort Worth area. The case was paired with a similar lawsuit by the U.S. Justice Department, which hadn’t said as of Wednesday morning if it will join the appeal.

Experts estimated that 600,000 Texans lack the photo ID required, a disproportionate number of whom are black and Hispanic.

Read the Texans’ filing with the Supreme Court below.

SCOTUS – Veasey

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: