Where Security Experts Stand On The Claim Climate Change Causes Terrorism

People light candles and place flowers at the Place de la Republique in Paris, France, 15 November 2015. At least 129 people were killed during a series of overnight terror attacks in Paris from 13 to 14 November 20... People light candles and place flowers at the Place de la Republique in Paris, France, 15 November 2015. At least 129 people were killed during a series of overnight terror attacks in Paris from 13 to 14 November 2015. Photo by: Malte Christians/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) may have been mocked for his claim during Saturday’s Democratic debate that “climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism.” But his comment touched upon what has become a focus of research and planning in the defense and intelligence worlds.

For years, those in the national security community has considered climate change threat to American interests here and abroad, and are now exploring how climate change is exacerbating the conditions that lead to civil unrest.

Experts tell TPM that the national security community is taking seriously the idea that climate change, primarily by causing resource scarcity, is leading to more instability in regions vulnerable to unrest. That in turn, some believe, is helping to create the breeding grounds for terrorism, among other types of human conflict.

“You can really see how in lots of parts of the world, that can really undermine government or really create the kinds of sentiments that would foster the emergence and the existence of terrorist groups there,” said Dan Chiu, the deputy director of the Atlantic Council’s Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security. He previously served in the Department of Defense, where he worked on the sort of logistical plans now taking climate change into account.

The defense community’s interest in the effects climate change spans a variety of issues: from how rising sea levels and other environmental changes will affect military installations to what regions of the world will be more prone to disaster, and thus in need of humanitarian assistance and coordination.


Bernie Sanders was mocked for claiming that “climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism.”

But there is also a school of thought that views climate change as a “threat multiplier.” As U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice has explained: “[E]ven if climate change isn’t the spark that directly ignites conflict, it increases the size of the powder keg.”

“As the Earth heats up, many countries will experience growing competition for reduced food and water resources. Rather than stay and starve, people will fight for their survival,” Rice said in a speech last month, pointing to a study that showed that strong causal evidence linking climate changes violent conflicts around the world.

A number of papers have also been released by government agencies and their partners examining how to plan for climate change in their operations. The research has been underway since the early years of the George W. Bush administration. In 2003 the Department of Defense released a paper examining the national security implications for abrupt climate change.

“There’s nothing political about it all,” said Francesco Femia, co-founder and director of the Center for Climate and Security. “This spans administrations and doesn’t necessarily have to do with a particular party.”

The specific connection between political unrest and climate change is still a murky one, and there is a debate among experts how strong the connection is to terrorism.

“At this point, it’s a bit of an operating assumption of our national security community with respect to how they look to the future and how they plan for the future and where they see the faultline appearing in and between populations and governments and their people,” said Nate Freier, a research professor in national security studies at Navy War College. “But I don’t think there’s necessarily yet a hard link between climate change, and that causing clear and present national security threat by itself.”

Chui suggested that the strong rhetoric used by Sanders and Rice was “mostly for effect — to really say that you cannot discount climate insecurity.”

“From a purely descriptive and analytic standpoint, I probably wouldn’t call [the link between climate change and terrorism] ‘direct,’” Chiu said. “I would call it more environmental and contextual. The effect of climate change can really create conditions that promote terrorism.”


Undated file photo from the Islamic State taken in Homs area of Syria in 2015.

Take the argument made about the current Syrian unrest: Climate change may have increased the chances of the recent severe drought in Syria, the effects of which the Assad regime worsened through mismanagement of crops and irrigation priorities. The widespread devastation of livestock and farmland led to a mass displacement of millions of people, raising discontent toward the Assad government, the theory goes.

“All of these things came together to create this massive displacement,” Femia said. “What we don’t fully know is to what degrees that that massive internal displacement contributed to social unrest.“

Other are more skeptical of that argument: “There is a water problem in the Middle East,” Freier said. “The Middle East’s political problems predate the heightened water problem.”

But, the specifics of Syria aside, the effect of climate change on national security is something the United States and other countries are not dismissing.

“As both from a research perspective, and as from a strategic development perspective, the Department of Defense, State Department and all the national security departments — just wrapping their arms for what this means for security is the first and primary step that is being taken and needs to be taken.” Freier said.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Other are more skeptical of that argument: “There is a water problem in the Middle East," Freier said. “The Middle East’s political problems predate the heightened water problem.”
    

    Well, sure. Almost all problems exist already in some form or another. Iraq wasn´t an Edenic representative democracy before the Bush administration debathified the country, alienating the Sunnis and leading eventually to ISIS. But when you add 1.5 million Syrians displaced by drought to the refugees streaming in from our ill-advised and bungled Iraq War, you have a prescription for political upheaval, and ISIS was there and ready.

  2. Avatar for lio lio says:

    If you folks in the media would devote at least as much attention to the national security community’s concerns about climate change as you do to the stupid shit said by Trump, the public would be exponentially more informed on the issue.

  3. True. That said, Ms. Sneed did a great job putting together this article – it’s very informative. Id love to see more here and I’d love to see more of the Main Stream Media–and, gee, that includes FOX Entertainment–tackle this issue from these angles. Our nation’s security people have been working on it for the better part of a decade and more … so no rational reason for the news media not to perform some comprehensive reporting.

  4. Avatar for dweb dweb says:

    Iran didn’t come to the bargaining table because it enjoys the process. Part of the driving force behind the decision to talk was water. Iran is facing increasing problems with water shortages. It has not done a good job of managing water resources and with sanctions, has faced increasing problems trying to address the problem.

    Iran’s rulers are increasingly worried about this matter and aware that drought is driving more and more people off the land and into major cities, increasing the potential for civil unrest. They are also competing with neighbors for water. Sanders is no dummy, nor in this case are the threat analysts in the military. This is going to get worse and it is not going to be pretty, and to be blunt, climate deniers are not only incredibly stupid, they are increasingly dangerous in their diversion of attention from a problem that affects the entire globe.

  5. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    A Bernie Sanders story containing substantive information! Color me shocked!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for deuce Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for wial Avatar for avattoir Avatar for dweb Avatar for trnc Avatar for rudesan Avatar for lio Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for darcy Avatar for dickweed Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for bearpaw Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for beattycat Avatar for jalus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: