Supreme Court Will Decide If Same-Sex Marriage Is A Constitutional Right

FILE - In this April 9, 2010 file photo, the Supreme Court is seen in Washington. The Supreme Court is debating whether young teenagers convicted of killing someone may be locked up for life with no chance of parole,... FILE - In this April 9, 2010 file photo, the Supreme Court is seen in Washington. The Supreme Court is debating whether young teenagers convicted of killing someone may be locked up for life with no chance of parole, the latest in a line of cases seeking a second chance for young people. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a case that could bring about the end of same-sex marriage bans across the country.

The justices announced in an order that they will consider if state bans on gay marriage violate the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Oral arguments are likely to be heard in April — the justices allotted two and a half hours to the issue. And a decision is expected by the end of June.

The long-awaited move was triggered by a ruling at the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which became the first appeals court since the 2013 decision against the Defense of Marriage Act to uphold gay marriage bans in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee. The Cincinnati-based 6th Circuit court had split with appellate courts at the 10th Circuit, 7th Circuit, 4th Circuit and 9th Circuit, all of which struck down gay marriage bans in the regions they cover.

Earlier this year the Supreme Court declined to take the cases, which paved the way for legal gay marriage in 30 states and the District of Columbia.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had indicated in September that “there will be some urgency” for the Supreme Court to step in if the 6th Circuit were to rule against same-sex marriage.

The Supreme Court announced two questions it will consider in the case:

1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? 2) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state?

Gay rights advocates are optimistic. The Supreme Court has issued only three rulings in its history supporting the cause of gay rights — all three are since 1996, and the majority opinion in each one was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy. The most recent one, to require the federal government to recognize legal gay marriages, was decided in 2013 by a 5 to 4 vote.

The Obama administration will file a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Supreme Court to “urge the Supreme Court to make marriage equality a reality for all Americans,” U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement on Friday. “It is time for our nation to take another critical step forward to ensure the fundamental equality of all Americans—no matter who they are, where they come from, or whom they love.”

This article was updated to include a statement from the Obama administration.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Perhaps the SCOTUS will offer a decision out of left field that not only declares same-sex marriage to be a Constitutional right, but also declaring it to be mandatory.

  2. Isn’t the horse already out of the barn on this, at least in the many states that opted not to fight the lower court rulings and began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples? Even if the Supreme Court says that each state can decide for itself on this topic, will states nullify marriages that have already been licensed and occured?

  3. This goes the right way and Scalia’s dissent is going to be a giant, frothy, bigot-screed for the record books. Can’t wait to read it and weep tears of schadenfreude.

  4. I can’t wait to see the catastrophic meltdown and apoplexy on the right. Also,I very much appreciate that this decision will come down a little more than a month before the first GOP debates.

  5. Good point.

    ROPE!!!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

68 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for sooner Avatar for charliee Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for foundryman Avatar for horrido Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for phlebas Avatar for hugopreuss Avatar for constitutionfan Avatar for dbutch Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for bpurcell Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for map2 Avatar for answerthis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: