Supreme Court Puts North Carolina Voting Restrictions Back Into Effect

A view of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, June 27, 2012. Saving its biggest case for last, the Supreme Court is expected to announce its verdict Thursday on President Barack Obama's health care law. The o... A view of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, June 27, 2012. Saving its biggest case for last, the Supreme Court is expected to announce its verdict Thursday on President Barack Obama's health care law. The outcome is likely to be a factor in the presidential campaign and help define John Roberts' legacy as chief justice. But the court's ruling almost certainly will not be the last word on America's tangled efforts to address health care woes. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) MORE LESS

The Supreme Court put North Carolina’s restrictive voting law back into effect on Wednesday.

The justices reversed a move last week by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals to block provisions of the law — which scrapped same-day registration amid early voting periods and invalidated votes cast outside an assigned precinct — from taking effect. A divided appeals court panel had determined that the provisions would “adversely” affect African-American and minority voters.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision, siding with the 4th Circuit’s decision to block parts of the law. “North Carolina places heavy reliance on the fact that African-American turnout during the 2014 primary election … increased compared to the 2010 primary election,” Ginsburg wrote.

The Supreme Court’s order is temporary, and gives the state of North Carolina time to appeal to the justices for a final ruling. The law will remain in effect until the justices either review the case and make a decision, or turn it down (and let the appeals court have the last word).

For now, that means the voting restrictions are likely to remain in effect for the midterm elections. That could impact the reelection hopes of Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC), who is relying more on minority voters than her Republican opponent.

8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I guess the SCOTUS hasn’t read the latest GAO report on the subject. It sucks, but one can only hope that it blow right up in the Teatrolls’ faces by working the way they intend it to work, providing the evidence that will undo it.

  2. This is as blatantly a political decision as Bush v. Gore was.

    There is no other rational explanation for such overt stupidity from the K-RATS.

  3. Avatar for bdtex bdtex says:

    Mission Accomplished.

  4. WTF is wrong with them?

    It is past time for a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to vote. We can include forbidding gerrymandering in the same amendment.

    Who’s with me?

  5. One can only hope that this BS pisses off black and minority voters in the state SO much that they turn out in droves.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for jekyll Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for sniffit Avatar for thunderclapnewman

Continue Discussion