Senators Reach Bipartisan Deal On New Russia Sanctions

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., outlines his bipartisan bill requiring congressional review of any comprehensive nuclear agreement that President Barack Obama reaches with Iran, at th... Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., outlines his bipartisan bill requiring congressional review of any comprehensive nuclear agreement that President Barack Obama reaches with Iran, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 3, 2015. He is joined at rear, from left, by, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. The senators had just heard Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's concerns about Iran's nuclear program during a controversial address to Congress that was criticized by President Obama. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Senators on Monday evening reached a bipartisan deal to impose new sanctions on Russia over its attempts to meddle in the 2016 election, its involvement in the conflict in Syria and its invasion of Crimea.

The deal would also allow Congress to review any attempts by President Donald Trump to ease U.S. sanctions on Russia.

The deal, which was negotiated by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), will come up for a vote in the Senate on Wednesday, according to Politico. McConnell filed the deal Monday evening as an amendment to a bill upping sanctions on Iran, according to the Washington Post.

“By codifying existing sanctions and requiring Congressional review of any decision to weaken or lift them, we are ensuring that the United States continues to punish President Putin for his reckless and destabilizing actions,” Schumer said in a statement about the amendment. “These additional sanctions will also send a powerful and bipartisan statement to Russia and any other country who might try to interfere in our elections that they will be punished.”

The bill would have to pass the House before heading to Trump’s desk. The President has not publicly weighed in on the new Russia sanctions, and if the House passes the deal, it could force Trump to take a stance on Russia sanctions.

The Senate waited to propose a Russia sanctions deal because Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), the chair of the Foreign Relations Committee, wanted to give the Trump administration time to work with Russia on Syria policy, according to the Washington Post.

“I wanted to give [Secretary of State Rex] Tillerson until two weeks ago,” Corker said, per the Post. “I’ve been ready the whole time.”

Corker said that he thinks Trump “has to at least strongly consider supporting this” but that the Senate may have a veto-proof majority supporting the bill, according to the Washington Post.

Latest DC
17
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Uh oh… PeePee’s Overlord will not be pleased that his puppet is not only not lifting existing sanctions but may instead adding more to the mix!

    I predict this will pass in the House because the GOP lemmings are looking to 2018 and not liking their chances, but Vlad won’t allow his puppet to sign this bill.

    Does Tramp risk vetoing this legislation? You bet!

  2. I’m thinking trump’s marker pen will be out of ink.

  3. Avatar for darcy darcy says:

    “By codifying existing sanctions and requiring Congressional review of any decision to weaken or lift them,

    ‘Congressional review’? This gives Congress the power to do what exactly? Putin is desperate to have the existing sanctions lifted and Trump is desperate to please Putin. Don’t get it.

  4. More likely Trump will have a signing ceremony and then walk out without signing the bill.

  5. I think this is an early sign of Congress snapping back at Trump’s bullshit. They may not be willing to publicly reprimand him, but a veto-proof bill giving his pro-Russia stance the middle finger is the legislative equivalent of a shot across the bow. A reminder that his power is limited and he can’t keep faffing Congress around, President or not.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

11 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for maxie Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for wildeye Avatar for darcy Avatar for dnl Avatar for clauscph Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for chlarry Avatar for krux Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for nj

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: